2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.12.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of dietary fiber method AOAC 2011.25 in fruit and comparison with AOAC 991.43 method

Abstract: AOAC 2011.25 method enables the quantification of most of the dietary fiber (DF) components according to the definition proposed by Codex Alimentarius. This study aimed to compare the DF content in fruits analyzed by the AOAC 2011.25 and AOAC 991.43 methods. Plums (Prunus salicina), atemoyas (Annona x atemoya), jackfruits (Artocarpus heterophyllus), and mature coconuts (Cocos nucifera) from different Brazilian regions (3 lots/fruit) were analyzed for DF, resistant starch, and fructans contents. The AOAC 2011.2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average insoluble dietary fiber content of the tested samples was 32.01 ± 0.21 g/100 g DW. The content of insoluble dietary fiber fraction depends on many critical factors, such as drying time and temperature (Tobaruelaet al, ). The drying temperature of HAD was much higher than that of VFD and MVD, resulting in significant lower insoluble dietary fiber content ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average insoluble dietary fiber content of the tested samples was 32.01 ± 0.21 g/100 g DW. The content of insoluble dietary fiber fraction depends on many critical factors, such as drying time and temperature (Tobaruelaet al, ). The drying temperature of HAD was much higher than that of VFD and MVD, resulting in significant lower insoluble dietary fiber content ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bananas have been reported to contain a significant amount of RS [12], with levels decreasing throughout ripening, and RS is considered dietary fiber according to the current definition [9]. Perhaps the most touted aspect of the mEG compared to the EG method is that it includes non-digestible low molecular weight oligosaccharides (LMWSDF) (for example, fructans, stachyose, raffinose) present in some foods such as legumes and some fruits [40,41]. However, another difference is that the mEG method does not involve initial "cooking" (autoclaving or boiling) that renders some types of resistant starch accessible to digestive enzymes.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total (TDF) and insoluble (IDF) dietary fiber were determined by method AOAC 2011.25 [ 55 ]. Soluble (SDF) dietary fiber was calculated as a difference between TDF and IDF according to Tobaruela et al [ 55 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%