2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of diamond-like carbon coatings to elastomers frictional surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One should bear in mind that higher hydrophobicity of the surface is usually related to a higher chemical stability. Actually, in our experiments SFE of NBR elastomers decreased by 9% after DLC deposition [77]. For hydrogenated HNBR elastomer, the variations in the hydrophobicity after DLC coatings were statistically insignificant.…”
Section: Characterization Of Surface Chemical Composition After Atmoscontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One should bear in mind that higher hydrophobicity of the surface is usually related to a higher chemical stability. Actually, in our experiments SFE of NBR elastomers decreased by 9% after DLC deposition [77]. For hydrogenated HNBR elastomer, the variations in the hydrophobicity after DLC coatings were statistically insignificant.…”
Section: Characterization Of Surface Chemical Composition After Atmoscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Despite the small variations observed in the surface chemical composition, DLC-coated elastomers presented better tribological performance reflected in a significant reduction in the coefficient of friction (COF) and friction noise [77]. Also, water CA increased for NBR after DLC deposition ( Figure 10) indicating the increase in the hydrophobic character of NBR elastomer surfaces after DLC deposition.…”
Section: Characterization Of Surface Chemical Composition After Atmosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nakahigashi et al [4] reported a strong reduction of CoF after deposition of the DLC film when compared to unprotected rubbers, although the lowest CoF reached under their low-load tribotest condition was around~0.7. In contrast, Martínez et al [5] studied much stronger conditions (10 and 40 N load), reaching CoFs of 0.44 and 0.23 as lowest values, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This leads to a modification of the surface energy. On the other hand, from the perspective of the material, the surface energy of elastomer substrates [53], DLC and MoS2 are also different. These two factors together affect the difference of the surface energy after coating.…”
Section: Surface Energymentioning
confidence: 99%