2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of deep learning technique to manage COVID-19 in routine clinical practice using CT images: Results of 10 convolutional neural networks

Abstract: Fast diagnostic methods can control and prevent the spread of pandemic diseases like coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and assist physicians to better manage patients in high workload conditions. Although a laboratory test is the current routine diagnostic tool, it is time-consuming, imposing a high cost and requiring a wellequipped laboratory for analysis. Computed tomography (CT) has thus far become a fast method to diagnose patients with COVID-19. However, the performance of radiologists in diagnosis of C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
567
2
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 753 publications
(616 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
567
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in Bai et al (2020) showed that their DL based CAD system achieved higher test accuracy (96% vs. 85%), sensitivity (95% vs. 79%), and specificity (96% vs. 88%) than radiologists. Whereas in Ardakani et al (2020) the performance of the radiologist was lower than the authors' proposed DL-based CAD system, with a sensitivity of (89.21% vs. 98.04%), specificity of (83.33% vs. 98.04%), and accuracy of (86.27% vs. 99.5%). On the other hand, in Chen et al (2020), the authors showed that their DL based CAD system can reduce the manual radiologist's diagnosis time by 65%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors in Bai et al (2020) showed that their DL based CAD system achieved higher test accuracy (96% vs. 85%), sensitivity (95% vs. 79%), and specificity (96% vs. 88%) than radiologists. Whereas in Ardakani et al (2020) the performance of the radiologist was lower than the authors' proposed DL-based CAD system, with a sensitivity of (89.21% vs. 98.04%), specificity of (83.33% vs. 98.04%), and accuracy of (86.27% vs. 99.5%). On the other hand, in Chen et al (2020), the authors showed that their DL based CAD system can reduce the manual radiologist's diagnosis time by 65%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The outperformance of CNN was proven in the related studies by various authors (Bai et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2020;Ardakani et al, 2020), who compared the performance of their CAD system based on DL techniques, with that of a trained radiologist without the help of a CAD system. These studies indicated that the performance of DL based CAD systems outperformed manual diagnosis by a trained radiologist without the help of a CAD system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These extracted features are then made the basis of the detection of COVID-19. This COVID Diagnosis System (InstaCovNet-19) is internally a deep learning model which consist of various pre-trained models such as ResNet-101 [6] , Inception v3 [7] , Xception [8] , MobileNetv2 [9] and NASNet [10] . These pre-trained models are then combined using the Integrated stacking technique, where the features are combined to produce the most accurate results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For COVID detection, AlexNet, VGGNet, GoogleNet, MobileNet, ResNet, SqueezeNet and Xception architectures were used. The best results were obtained with ResNet-101 and Xception [21]. In another study on CT images, a deep learning model was developed on 4352 images collected from 332 patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MobileNet is based on linear bottlenecks and inverted residual. It starts convolution layers, followed by inverted residual blocks, linear bottlenecks blocks, convolution layer and fully connected dense layer[21]. Inception-V3 was improved version of the GoogleNet (In 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%