2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Cylindrical Cavity Expansion in MCC Model to a Sensitive Clay under Ko Consolidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The associated flow rule adopted in the OCC model, along with the zero total volumetric strain constraint imposed by the undrained condition of cavity expansion, leads Equation (11) to…”
Section: Original Cam Clay Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The associated flow rule adopted in the OCC model, along with the zero total volumetric strain constraint imposed by the undrained condition of cavity expansion, leads Equation (11) to…”
Section: Original Cam Clay Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 40 years, the development of analytic technique for the analysis of cavity expansion in soils, a fundamental problem in theoretical geomechanics with many practical applications such as pressuremeter/cone penetration test interpretation and pile-driving modeling, has reached a maturity state in terms of the novelty of the solution procedure/strategy involved (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and the sophistication level of the constitutive model used. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The approaches commonly adopted for the solutions of cavity expansion problems, especially in the critical state soils, appear to be the similarity method (and its variants) proposed by Collins and his co-workers 4,20,21 and the rigorous Lagrangian-based solution procedure developed by Chen 22 and Chen & Abousleiman.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24]) and interpretation of pressuremeter tests in sensitive soils (e.g. [17,30,31]) using a post-failure strain softening had been presented, the authors' solutions are the first ones for anisotropic, structure (inter-particle bonding) and destructuration behaviour of plastic nature of clays. It is worth noting that neglecting soil structure leads to inaccurate predictions of clay responses under external loading (e.g.…”
Section: S-clay1s [16]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By substituting Eq. (34, 36) into (26,27,31), applying plane strain conditions, i.e. de z ¼ 0, and following the approach used by Chen and Abousleiman [8], the change of specific volume can be obtained from Eqs.…”
Section: Hardening Rule Of the Intrinsic Yield Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang & Sun [24] further developed a similar solution by employing a bounding surface plasticity model and the state-dependent dilatancy for crushable granular materials. As demonstrated by Silvestri and Tabib [47], neglecting the destructuration might produce erroneous interpretations of pressuremeter tests in sensitive clays, which implied the need of cavity expansion solution for natural clays. An undrained cylindrical cavity expansion in structured Camclay model [32] was reported by Nanda and Patra [39], without considering the effects of anisotropy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%