2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of CVaR risk aversion approach in the dynamical scheduling optimization model for virtual power plant connected with wind-photovoltaic-energy storage system with uncertainties and demand response

Abstract: :Conditional value at risk (CVaR) and confidence degree theory are introduced to build scheduling model for VPP connecting with wind power plant (WPP), photovoltaic generators (PV), convention gas turbine (CGT), energy storage systems (ESSs) and incentive-based demand response (IBDR). Latin hypercube sampling method and Kantorovich distance are introduced to construct uncertainties analysis method. A risk aversion scheduling model is proposed with minimum CVaR objective considering maximum operation revenue. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“… ΔL PB , t and ΔQ t are the load changed by PBDR. According to the theory of microeconomics, PBDR is described by the demand‐price elasticity e , take ΔL PB , t as an example, the detailed calculation method could be described as follows: ΔLitalicPB,t=Lt0×{}ett×[]PtPt0/Pt0+lefts=1st24est×[]PsPs0/Ps0. According to Equation , the load is mainly influenced from two aspects, namely, itself ( e st , self‐elasticity, only demand curtailment can occur in this way) and other time periods ( e st , cross‐elasticity, demand shifting can also occur in this way) …”
Section: Basic Scheduling Model For Vepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… ΔL PB , t and ΔQ t are the load changed by PBDR. According to the theory of microeconomics, PBDR is described by the demand‐price elasticity e , take ΔL PB , t as an example, the detailed calculation method could be described as follows: ΔLitalicPB,t=Lt0×{}ett×[]PtPt0/Pt0+lefts=1st24est×[]PsPs0/Ps0. According to Equation , the load is mainly influenced from two aspects, namely, itself ( e st , self‐elasticity, only demand curtailment can occur in this way) and other time periods ( e st , cross‐elasticity, demand shifting can also occur in this way) …”
Section: Basic Scheduling Model For Vepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proposed VEP, five uncertainty factors exist, namely, g WPP , t , g PV , t , Q SC , t , L t , and Q t . How to simulate the uncertainty factors and develop the optimal strategies for VEP is great important for decision makers. Just like the analysis in Section , the natural wind speed and the solar irradiance could be described by the probability distribution function . Similarly, the Rayleigh distribution function could be also used to simulate the heating output of SC.…”
Section: Cvar‐robust‐based Scheduling Model For Vepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cassell University in Germany has created the largest HES pilot project to combine wind turbines, solar systems, biogas power stations and hydropower stations [7]. In 2009, Danish Electric Vehicles considered the uncertainty of large-scale wind farms in the project of accessing smart grids, and the intelligent charging and discharging of electric vehicles was managed by HES technology [8]. In 2008, a distributed energy station was put into operation in Guangdong University City in China.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%