2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13143-019-00113-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Cumulative Distribution Functions to Compositing Precipitable Water with Low Earth Orbit Satellite Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CDF method was first proposed by Reichle and Koster [31] to reduce the bias of satellite soil moisture. It has been widely used to remove systematic biases between observation data and reference data [32]- [34]. The CDF of the satellite-derived SST should be the same as that of the in situ SST, so the bias of the satellite observations could be defined as the difference between the satellite-retrieved SST and the in situ SST at the same percentiles.…”
Section: Bias Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CDF method was first proposed by Reichle and Koster [31] to reduce the bias of satellite soil moisture. It has been widely used to remove systematic biases between observation data and reference data [32]- [34]. The CDF of the satellite-derived SST should be the same as that of the in situ SST, so the bias of the satellite observations could be defined as the difference between the satellite-retrieved SST and the in situ SST at the same percentiles.…”
Section: Bias Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous study, different periods were selected to generate reference data or train data for the similar method [23], [34], [35]. Here, simple tests are performed to decide the best period for calculating regression coefficients using the data in January and July in 2019, respectively.…”
Section: Bias Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, merging AOD products derived from both GEO and LEO satellite sensors could yield more comprehensive results [37]. Therefore, the spatiotemporal differences between different AOD products should be minimized to ensure a more comprehensive representation of natural phenomenon [38]. However, retrieving high-resolution AOD at varying scales is still a challenging task due to the low signal-to-noise ratio in sensing, algorithmic synthesis constraints, downscaling issues, and data gaps resulting from adverse impacts such as cloud contamination [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%