2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Convolution Perfectly Matched Layer in MRTD scattering model for non-spherical aerosol particles and its performance analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the simulation accuracy of the IIM T-Matrix method for non-rotational symmetric particles (which cannot be effectively simulated by the EBCM T-Matrix method), the results of the IIM T-Matrix method are further compared with that of the MRTD model developed by our team [27,41].…”
Section: Hexagonal Prism Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To validate the simulation accuracy of the IIM T-Matrix method for non-rotational symmetric particles (which cannot be effectively simulated by the EBCM T-Matrix method), the results of the IIM T-Matrix method are further compared with that of the MRTD model developed by our team [27,41].…”
Section: Hexagonal Prism Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the IIM T-Matrix method is derived from the volume integral equation, compared to the T-Matrix method which is based on surface integral principles (i.e., "EBCM" or the "null field method"), it can be applied to the scattering calculations of particle with arbitrary shapes and inhomogeneous compositions, which can greatly expand the application scope of the T-Matrix method. Domain (PSTD) [23][24][25], and Multi-Resolution Time Domain (MRTD) [26,27]. DDA and FDTD can be applied to the light scattering calculation for particles with arbitrary shape; however, due to the limitation of their computational stability and complexity, it is a tough job for them to simulate the light scattering by particles with large sizes [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 To simulate an unbounded domain with the finite element method, appropriate boundary conditions have to be imposed on the artificial boundary, which is considered as transparent boundaries. 13,[17][18][19] Otherwise, infinite elements 20 have to be employed. Both of the techniques aim at replacing the radiation condition at infinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] Despite the excellent performance of PSTD, there are two aspects that need to be improved: first, owing to the specificity of its discretization form, the incident field is mainly introduced by a pure scattering field technique in the PSTD scheme now, which is difficult and time-consuming for particles with large size and complex shapes; second, the absorption boundary conditions (ABCs) employed in the PSTD scheme are mainly limited to Berenger's perfectly matched layer (BPML) and uniaxial perfectly matched layer (UPML), whose performance is relatively low compared to convolution perfectly matched layer (CPML) and ADE-PML for the FDTD scheme. [35] To improve model's performance, Sun et al [4] generalized the CPML for the PSTD model. Here, we generalize the weighted total field/scattering field (TF/SF) technique [36] and ADE-PML for the 3D-PSTD scheme and an improved PSTD scattering model of our own is established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%