Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups.

Assessing self‐efficacy for coping with cancer: development and psychometric analysis of the brief version of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI‐B)

“…A well-fitted model would ideally have a non-significant χ 2 statistic; however, for larger samples around 200 or greater, as in the case of this study, the χ 2 will invariably be significant and is not the optimal measure of fit. A better index of fit, which was used in this research, is a χ 2 /df ratio between two and five with lower values indicating better fit (39). In addition, adequate fit is indicated by indices .90 or greater and values of up to .08, representing reasonable errors of approximation (40).…”

The Effects of Marketing Stimuli Factors on Consumers’ Perceived Value and Purchase of Organic Food in Malaysia

“…The chi-square value is 1324.28 and according to Barrett (2007), chi square probability value greater than 0.05 indicated acceptable model fit. The ratio of x 2 /df was 2.8, lower than the value 3.0, as suggested by Byrne (2001) and Marsh and Hocevar (1985). Incremental fit indices were greater than 0.9, with IFI of 0.924, CFI of 0.92 and TLI of 0.915.…”

Questionário de Sentido de Vida: Evidências de sua Validade Fatorial e Consistência Interna

“…De forma específica, com relação aos índices de ajustes (GFI, CFI e AGFI), o modelo bifatorial apresentou-se mais promissor, considerando que todos foram próximos de 1 (0,90 e 0,95), sendo que seu RMSEA se situou em intervalo de confiança aceitável. Com relação ao χ 2 /gl, obteve-se valor igualmente dentro do recomendado (Marsh & Hocevar, 1995 …”