2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Climate Assessment Tool (CAT) to estimate climate variability impacts on nutrient loading from local watersheds

Abstract: A vast amount of future climate scenario datasets, created by climate models such as general circulation models (GCMs), have been used in conjunction with watershed models to project future climate variability impact on hydrological processes and water quality. However, these low spatial-temporal resolution datasets are often difficult to downscale spatially and disaggregate temporarily, and they may not be accurate for local watersheds (i.e., state level or smaller watersheds). This study applied the US-EPA (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among various approaches to the climate change impact assessment on hydrology, such as water quality, crop yield, soil erosion etc., the application of hydrological models is the most effective method [6][7][8][9]. A hydrologic and water quality model, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) has been extensively used to analyse the impact of climate change on hydrology and water quality by incorporating the climate data on the model [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various approaches to the climate change impact assessment on hydrology, such as water quality, crop yield, soil erosion etc., the application of hydrological models is the most effective method [6][7][8][9]. A hydrologic and water quality model, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) has been extensively used to analyse the impact of climate change on hydrology and water quality by incorporating the climate data on the model [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, previous studies have suggested that pollution management by BMPs will be undermined by changes in watershed hydrology resulting from climate change . In the northeastern United States, terrestrial nutrient losses are expected to rise via an increase in patterns of drought followed by intense rainfalls, which will lead to greater nutrient loads flushed into receiving waters. Furthermore, it is expected that increased temperatures will lead to a greater amount of nitrogen and phosphorus being released from organic matter both in the landscape and in waterways, which will further increase nutrient levels in waterways . Indeed, a study of a 724 km 2 watershed in Korea showed increased TP loads into waterways under the RCP 4.5 climate scenario .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LMRAV is situated in the floodplain of the Mississippi River (MR) beginning from the north at Illinois, continuing through Missouri, Kentucky, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Mississippi, and ending at the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) in South Louisiana. Clearcuttings of bottomland hardwood forests, conversions from forests to agricultural lands with intensive crop production, and intensified and extreme precipitations are the major factors affect river flooding, wetland loss, and water quality degradation in the MR and the adjacent GOM (Munoz and Dee 2017;Ouyang et al 2013Ouyang et al , 2018Ouyang et al , 2020. Three NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) weather stations, namely the USC00226177 in Natchez, Mississippi; USC00113580 in Grand Chain Dam 53, Illinois; and USC035691 in Williams Junction, Arkansas, were selected to download the daily precipitation data (Figure 1).…”
Section: Study Site and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%