2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.931-932.446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Cement-Based Sensor on Compressive Strain Monitoring in Concrete Members

Abstract: The aim of this research was to implement cement-based sensors in monitoring the change of strain in concrete structures in particular where a compression applies. The experiment was conducted in a laboratory by embedding a cement-based sensor in a 150x150x150 mm normal strength concrete cube. When the sensor-installed concrete cube was loaded, the relation between the fractional change in resistivity (FCR) and strain of the sensors was evaluated. In this study, all cement-based sensors were made of cement pas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the literature [45][46][47] four mortar specimens were prepared for the piezoresistive test, in cubic shape samples with a 40 mm edge, dimensions recommended in NBR 16868-2 48 for compression test. The mortar mix rate was made in the following proportions of cement, sand, and graphite: T1C=1:4:0; T2C=1:4:0.125; T3C=1:4:0.250; and T4C=1:4:0.375, in proportions to the cement mass, and these graphite proportions are within the range (0-0.4) used by 49 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the literature [45][46][47] four mortar specimens were prepared for the piezoresistive test, in cubic shape samples with a 40 mm edge, dimensions recommended in NBR 16868-2 48 for compression test. The mortar mix rate was made in the following proportions of cement, sand, and graphite: T1C=1:4:0; T2C=1:4:0.125; T3C=1:4:0.250; and T4C=1:4:0.375, in proportions to the cement mass, and these graphite proportions are within the range (0-0.4) used by 49 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were tested by compression in a manual press, for three repetitions of each sample 45,52 , with a maximum load of nearly 2 kN 31,32 , since this load would not cause rupture of the samples, because it is a non-destructive test. The voltage (U) changes and force (compression) applied were recorded synchronously at a sampling rate of 10 Hz, using the scheme in Figure 6, which had a data acquisition system (DAQ) model 8000-8-SM (Micro-Measurements), a load cell, and a laptop.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these sensors have some problems, such as single testing direction, high cost, bad durability, and poor compatibility with concrete. The emergence of cement-based smart composites [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] provides a new sensing mean for structural health monitoring, and it has been well applied in civil engineering as embedded sensors. However, although the cement-based smart sensor has high sensitivity, good linearity, and well compatibility with concrete, it is greatly affected by environmental factors, especially temperature and humidity, and has poor plasticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%