2007
DOI: 10.4217/opr.2007.29.4.339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Biotic Indices to Assess the Health Condition of Benthic Community in Masan Bay, Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Some biotic indices were calculated simplely using only macrobenthic fauna data for assessing the community health conditions. Examples are AMBI (AZTI's Marine Biotic Index) [27] and BPI (Benthic Pollution Index) [7][8][9]. The theoretical basis of BPI was from the ITI (infaunal trophic index) proposed by Word [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some biotic indices were calculated simplely using only macrobenthic fauna data for assessing the community health conditions. Examples are AMBI (AZTI's Marine Biotic Index) [27] and BPI (Benthic Pollution Index) [7][8][9]. The theoretical basis of BPI was from the ITI (infaunal trophic index) proposed by Word [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus BPI is 0 when all fauna are composed of opportunistic or pollution indicative species, while BPI is 100 when all fauna are carnivores or filter feeders. Choi and Seo [8] and Seo et al [9] suggested that the threshold value of healthy conditions of BPI can be set as 60. They also classified the degree of health into five different stages using this threshold index value.…”
Section: Data Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…또한 생태학적으로 빈산소환경인 2 mg/L에서도 견딜 수 있는 내성을 가지고 있을 뿐만 아니라, 하 계의 용존산소량에 따라서 개체수가 변화하므로 부영양화 해역의 지표종으로 분류되고 있다 (Imabayashi and Tsukuda, 1984). 본 연 구에서도 단위면적당(m 2 ) 280개체의 밀도를 나타내 진해만의 83 개체 (Lim et al, 1995b), 울산만의 113개체 (Yi et al, 1982) (1989,1992), Choi and Seo(2007) …”
Section: 우점종 및 군집구조unclassified
“…따라서 이러한 특성을 바 탕으로 생태계의 건강성을 파악하는 데 세계적으로 매우 유용하게 사용되고 있다 (McManus and Pauly, 1990;Peng, et al, 2013). 우리나라에서도 이것을 근거로 연안역 저서생태계 건강성 평가 연 구가 수행되었으며 (Choi and Seo, 2007), 최근에는 우리나라의 해 양 생태계에 적합한 생태계 건강성 지수(ecological health index) 개발도 시도되고 있다 (Yoo et al, 2010 (Choi, et al, 2003;Jung, et al, 1997) 밀도는 외해역에 비해 내해역에서 상대적으로 높았으며, 1,000…”
unclassified