2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-021-02549-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting the Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations on Rock Masses

Abstract: Calculation of the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on rock masses is usually addressed either using empirical equations, analytical solutions, or numerical models. While the empirical laws are limited to the particular conditions and local geology of the data and the application of analytical solutions is complex and limited by its simplified assumptions, numerical models offer a reliable solution for the task but require more computational effort. This research presents an artificial neural network (A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years, several methods were used to study bearing capacity: limit equilibrium method [1,2], slip line method [3], limit analysis method [4,5], numerical methods of finite elements (FEM) or DLO [6][7][8], and artificial intelligence techniques [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, several methods were used to study bearing capacity: limit equilibrium method [1,2], slip line method [3], limit analysis method [4,5], numerical methods of finite elements (FEM) or DLO [6][7][8], and artificial intelligence techniques [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analysis of the bearing capacity of foundations, several procedures have been developed: the limit equilibrium method [1,2], the characteristic line method [3], the limit analysis method [4,5], the kinematical approach (as a part of limit analyses) [6], the numerical method [7][8][9] and artificial intelligence techniques [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of geotechnical engineering, Terzaghi and Meyerhof methods remain those most commonly used [20] [21], although recent advances in technology have encouraged the use of software programs based on the finite element method. The use of the finite element method to solve various geotechnical problems is extremely useful, as a number of previous studies evidenced [22] [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%