2020
DOI: 10.1177/1687814020914732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of artificial neural networks for quantitative damage detection in unidirectional composite structures based on Lamb waves

Abstract: This article provides a quantitative nondestructive damage detection method through a Lamb wave technique assisted by an artificial neural network model for fiber-reinforced composite structures. For simulating damages with a variety of sizes, rectangular Teflon tapes with different lengths and widths are applied on a unidirectional carbon fiber–reinforced polymer composite plate. Two characteristic parameters, amplitude damage index and phase damage index, are defined to evaluate effects by the shape of the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research has focused on damage quantitative estimation by using Lamb wave signals features in combination with ANN and FEM in order to ensure the accuracy of ANN (strictly related to the data used to train the network) [10,16]. A Lamb-wave-based damage evaluation method assisted by an ANN model was presented by Qian et al [19], using Damage Indexes related to changes in amplitude and phase of recorded signals. They found a good agreement between experimental and predicted results in a carbon fiberreinforced polymer composite plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has focused on damage quantitative estimation by using Lamb wave signals features in combination with ANN and FEM in order to ensure the accuracy of ANN (strictly related to the data used to train the network) [10,16]. A Lamb-wave-based damage evaluation method assisted by an ANN model was presented by Qian et al [19], using Damage Indexes related to changes in amplitude and phase of recorded signals. They found a good agreement between experimental and predicted results in a carbon fiberreinforced polymer composite plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to unsupervised learning, supervised learning methods show higher performance and wider application prospects when some prior knowledge is available. ANNs, as one of the earliest proposed supervised deep learning methods, are employed for damage detection, impact force reconstruction and impact localization [ 15 , 24 ]. ANNs are a mathematical model which simulates a biological neural system, and hence has the ability to deal with non-linear problems.…”
Section: Machine Learning Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, machine learning methods, particularly neural networks, have been widely applied to extract useful information from large data sets efficiently. Some of the neural networks, like artificial neural networks (ANNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been successfully implemented in SHM, especially in damage detection, impact localization and impact classification [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], as well as the corresponding sensor optimization [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With advances in neurosciences and high-capability computing devices, recent research is focused on application of machine learning (ML) algorithms based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) for guided wave damage identification, localization and qualification including an assessment on the probability of occurrence of damage in metallic and composite structural members. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Jiahui et al 20 utilized probabilistic imaging algorithm and statistical method to reduce the impact of composite anisotropy in Lamb wave-based damage localization and quantification in composite plate like structures. The algorithm was validated by experiments and results indicate an accurate prediction of the damage localization and quantification with an absolute error within 11 mm and 2.2 mm respectively for a sensor spacing of 100 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%