2020
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of an Inclined Settler for Cell Culture-Based Influenza A Virus Production in Perfusion Mode

Abstract: Influenza viruses have been successfully propagated using a variety of animal cell lines in batch, fed-batch, and perfusion culture. For suspension cells, most studies reported on membrane-based cell retention devices typically leading to an accumulation of viruses in the bioreactor in perfusion mode. Aiming at continuous virus harvesting for improved productivities, an inclined settler was evaluated for influenza A virus (IAV) production using the avian suspension cell line AGE1.CR.pIX. Inclined settlers pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(98 reference statements)
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to other studies on influenza A virus, lentivirus, and adenovirus production, which demonstrated advantages regarding continuous virus harvesting in perfusion cultures. [ 23,28,29,34–36 ] Regarding the cell growth phase, a similar growth dynamics and a high cell viability (>90%) was achieved. Non‐toxic levels of released metabolites (<20 m m lactate and <3 m m ammonium) were observed regardless of the cell retention device, demonstrating a healthy state of the cells allowing high productivity after infection as already observed in previous studies [ 37–40 ] (Figure 2A–C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to other studies on influenza A virus, lentivirus, and adenovirus production, which demonstrated advantages regarding continuous virus harvesting in perfusion cultures. [ 23,28,29,34–36 ] Regarding the cell growth phase, a similar growth dynamics and a high cell viability (>90%) was achieved. Non‐toxic levels of released metabolites (<20 m m lactate and <3 m m ammonium) were observed regardless of the cell retention device, demonstrating a healthy state of the cells allowing high productivity after infection as already observed in previous studies [ 37–40 ] (Figure 2A–C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…(2020). [ 29 ] The IS was operated at a recirculation rate of 35 mL min −1 , intermittent vibration (15 s on, 10 min off) and with 30° angle. Water at a temperature of 27 °C was recirculated for heat exchange.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, continuous virus harvest with membrane-based cell retention remains problematic due to potential blocking of the membrane (Genzel et al 2014 ). Alternatively, cell retention devices like an acoustic settler might be used for continuous virus harvesting (Coronel et al 2020 ; Granicher et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, it was described that the mentioned alternative cell retention systems do not allow for complete cell retention and some cells are lost over the course of cultivations. Additionally, their separation principles rely on cell settling and therefore longer recirculation times were observed (Chotteau 2015;Coronel et al 2020;Granicher et al 2020). In the present study, no cells could be detected in the permeate line of the VHU (data not shown) and the cells only spent a few seconds outside the STR during each pumping cycle of the ATF system.…”
Section: Continuous Virus Harvesting With Non-membrane-based Perfusion Systems Compared To the Membrane-based Perfusion Cultivation Usingmentioning
confidence: 99%