2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017jb013971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of an improved spectral decomposition method to examine earthquake source scaling in Southern California

Abstract: Earthquake source spectra contain fundamental information about the dynamics of earthquake rupture. However, the inherent tradeoffs in separating source and path effects, when combined with limitations in recorded signal bandwidth, make it challenging to obtain reliable source spectral estimates for large earthquake data sets. We present here a stable and statistically robust spectral decomposition method that iteratively partitions the observed waveform spectra into source, receiver, and path terms. Unlike pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

19
153
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
19
153
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By itself, the corner frequency estimate data is not sufficient to test the scaling break either, because it contains very few events above the presumed scaling break at M w ~7.0. Notably, the study that extends the approach of the two corner frequency studies to large subduction zone earthquakes (35) finds the same scaling break that we report from M 0 1/3 to M 0 1/2 at M w ~7.0. However, owing to limitations of the employed methods they had to change methods at just the critical M w ~7.0.…”
Section: S6: Moment-duration Scaling From Alternative Data Setssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…By itself, the corner frequency estimate data is not sufficient to test the scaling break either, because it contains very few events above the presumed scaling break at M w ~7.0. Notably, the study that extends the approach of the two corner frequency studies to large subduction zone earthquakes (35) finds the same scaling break that we report from M 0 1/3 to M 0 1/2 at M w ~7.0. However, owing to limitations of the employed methods they had to change methods at just the critical M w ~7.0.…”
Section: S6: Moment-duration Scaling From Alternative Data Setssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…For steps (1) and (2), we consider P wave spectra of earthquakes with local magnitude M L 1.5 and greater, recorded on vertical‐component, high‐broadband, and short‐period channels (HHZ, HNZ, and EHZ), at stations within 150 km distance. For the spectral estimates, we use a magnitude‐dependent window length ranging from a minimum length of 1.5 s to a maximum length of 4.5 s, where longer windows correspond to larger events in order to permit adequate corner frequency resolution (Abercrombie et al, ; Ross & Ben‐Zion, ; Trugman & Shearer, ). We define the signal window to begin 0.05 s before the catalog‐listed P phase arrival time, truncate each window before the catalog‐listed S phase arrival when necessary, and define a noise window that immediately precedes the signal window and is of equal length.…”
Section: Methods: Relocations and Source Parameter Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the EGF correction term (step 3), we use the technique described by Trugman and Shearer () that fits stacked relative source spectra, averaged in bins of spectral moment Ω 0 to a Brune‐type theoretical spectrum of the form ŝ(0.3emf2.56804pt|2.56804ptΩ0,fc,n)=Ω01+(f/fc)n, where f c and Ω 0 are the corner frequency and spectral moment of each stacked spectra, and the high‐frequency falloff rate n is fixed to 2 per the widely used ω −2 model (Aki, ; Brune, ). In contrast to previous implementations of the spectral decomposition method (e.g., Shearer et al, ), our technique does not require an assumption of self‐similar or constant stress drop scaling and instead infers the optimal scaling directly from the shape of the stacked spectra.…”
Section: Methods: Relocations and Source Parameter Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations