2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of aluminium toxicity indices to soils under various forest species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The change of pH was a complicated process affected by many factors, and three reasons should explain why it decreased with the increase of mulching years. Firstly, chemical nitrogen fertilizer, which was applied before mulching, may accelerate the accumulation of N, resulting in nitrification and much more H + [9,32]. Secondly, the degradation of residual mulching materials and the cultivation of anaerobic bacteria may lead to the accumulation of phenolic acids and then result in soil acidification [33].…”
Section: Mulching Management and Soil Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change of pH was a complicated process affected by many factors, and three reasons should explain why it decreased with the increase of mulching years. Firstly, chemical nitrogen fertilizer, which was applied before mulching, may accelerate the accumulation of N, resulting in nitrification and much more H + [9,32]. Secondly, the degradation of residual mulching materials and the cultivation of anaerobic bacteria may lead to the accumulation of phenolic acids and then result in soil acidification [33].…”
Section: Mulching Management and Soil Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the average concentration of Al 3+ was 3·87 µmol L −1 but varied widely depending on bedrock. The average value is lower than the value of 6·13 µmol L −1 found for soils developed over granodiorites, slates and limestones and under P. radiata stands in the same region (Álvarez et al ., ). Values as high as 19·3 µmol L −1 were reported for mixed maritime pine and Scots pine stands over slates (Fernández‐Sanjurjo et al ., ), which is higher than the 5·16 µmol L −1 found in this study for the same bedrock.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The total Al present in the soil solution ranged between 17·2 and 64·2 µmol L −1 and was significantly higher in the plot over mica schist than in the soils developed over granite and biotitic schist (Table ). Similar concentrations of total Al have been reported in other forest soils in Galicia with presence of pines: 40·7–115·9 µmol L −1 for pure Pinus sylvestris and mixed P. pinaster and P. sylvestris , respectively (Fernández‐Sanjurjo et al ., ), and 33 µmol L −1 (Arbestain et al ., ) and 41·9 µmol L −1 (Álvarez et al ., ) for Pinus radiata . Nonetheless, the values obtained in the present study are high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that almost 40 % of the world's acid soils is due to the effects of aluminum toxicity, which is the key factor hampering plant (i.e., crop) performance on the acid soils. [2] In addition, aluminum is also deemed to be the primary toxicant killing fish in acidified waters. [3] Therefore, the development of fluorescent sensors for aluminum is critical in environmental monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reaction for 8 h, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was then purified by chromatography on silica gel (CH 2 (2:3) at room temperature to afford the sensor stock solution (50 µ). Test solutions were prepared by placing 2 mL of the sensor stock solution and an appropriate aliquot of each metal stock into a 5-mL volumetric flask and diluting the solution to 5 mL with methanol/CH 2 Cl 2 (2:3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%