Commentary on: Dayan PS, Holmes JF, Atabaki S, et al. Association of traumatic brain injuries with vomiting in children with blunt head trauma. Ann Emerg Med 2014;63:657-65.
ContextAccurate emergency diagnostic work up of children who have sustained a minor traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging. In most cases, symptoms are non-specific and may include episodes of altered or transient loss of consciousness, irritability, sleepiness or headache. Each physician must decide if clinical observation is sufficient to exclude intracranial complications or if a more aggressive diagnostic approach, including neuroimaging (eg, CT) should be pursued. The growing awareness of radiation-induced side effects urges each physician to take full advantage of the clinical findings. The current paper suggests that a history of vomiting is linked to an increased prevalence of TBI seen on CT, while the absence of vomiting is coupled with a decreased prevalence of TBI on CT. The desire to have an easy, safe, practical and reproducible diagnostic sign to predict TBI may have pushed for the inclusion of 'vomiting' in the diagnostic algorithm. The authors of this paper studied the significance and characteristics of vomiting in children with minor TBI.
MethodsA secondary analysis of a large prospective observational study conducted at 25 centres was performed. Inclusion criteria were: age ≤18 years; blunt head trauma, with presentation to the emergency department (ED) after <24 h of trauma; Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14-15; and acute head CT. Clinicians completed a standardised patient history and physical examination before head CT. History of vomiting, the number of vomiting episodes, timing of onset and the time since last episode were recorded. Isolated vomiting was defined in two ways: extensive (based on an extensive list of variables) versus an age-specific list of prediction rule variables defined by the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) on initial ED examination. Two categories of outcomes were defined: clinically-important TBI and TBI on CT. Outcomes were analysed in three groups: children with non-isolated vomiting; children with isolated vomiting (extensive definition); and children with isolated vomiting (PECARN definition). The rates of clinically-important TBI and TBI on CT were compared for children with and without isolated vomiting using the Newcombe-Wilson continuity-adjusted method.
FindingsOf 43 904 enrolled patients, 5392 children were included in the study. A total of 4577 (84.9%) had non-isolated vomiting, while 815 (15.1%) had isolated vomiting. Head CTs were performed in 3284 children (71.8%) with non-isolated vomiting and in 298 (36.6%) children with isolated vomiting. All patients with vomiting and clinically-important TBI had TBI on CT. Patients with isolated vomiting had a low prevalence of clinically-important TBI. Clinically-important TBI occurred in 2 of 815 (0.2%) patients in the isolated vomiting group, versus 114 of 4577 (2.5%) in the non-isolated vomiting group. TBI on CT...