Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of advanced genomic tools in food safety rapid diagnostics: challenges and opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, without publicly available information on the GMM strains of interest, this isolation step is particularly challenging due to the enormous list of microbial growth conditions to be tested, including possible auxotrophic mutations [15,48,[50][51][52][53][54]. In the absence of prior knowledge, a high-throughput sequencing strategy, like metagenomics, represents an interesting and promising option, as recently demonstrated [49,[55][56][57][58][59][60]. Nonetheless, metagenomics for the detection of GMMs in fermentation products is not yet mature enough to be implemented at the level of enforcement laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, without publicly available information on the GMM strains of interest, this isolation step is particularly challenging due to the enormous list of microbial growth conditions to be tested, including possible auxotrophic mutations [15,48,[50][51][52][53][54]. In the absence of prior knowledge, a high-throughput sequencing strategy, like metagenomics, represents an interesting and promising option, as recently demonstrated [49,[55][56][57][58][59][60]. Nonetheless, metagenomics for the detection of GMMs in fermentation products is not yet mature enough to be implemented at the level of enforcement laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveillance programs that include genome sequencing of Clostridial isolates with robust epidemiologic analyses provide critical information to aid in the rule-in or rule-out potential outbreak clusters. However, these species present unique challenges given the additional equipment and expertise needed to cultivate obligate anaerobes, including their selective culture from microbially dense samples such as stool or soil, or from food products that may have low pathogen concentrations 86 . While enrichment methods, including heat or alcoholtreatment of samples to enrich for spores can be employed, further specific lab equipment, personnel training, and infrastructure including BSL-2 and in some instances BSL-3 space for C. botulinum are required to support effective microbiologic cultivation 87 .…”
Section: Implementing Genomically Surveillance Programs For Toxigenic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, metagenomic approaches to detect pathogenic Clostridia in foodstuffs and in samples harboring complex microbial communities have been used 86 . Untargeted metagenomic sequencing, as well as with methods using ex vivo enrichment methods for biologic amplification of target species, has worked successfully with pathogens such as Salmonella enterica 88 and Listeria monocytogenes 89,90 , and is amenable for use with toxigenic Clostridia given readily available methods to enrich for spores in materials inoculated into pre-reduced anaerobic growth media which can be handled in the absence of anaerobic cultivating equipment required for agar plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the time from sample collection to positive culture for Salmonella is up to 7 days, involving 48-72 hours of enrichment culture, and 48-72 hours of growth on selective agar followed by biochemical testing to confirm presumptive Salmonella colonies [3]. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in exploring culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) such as quantitative PCR (qPCR), metabarcode sequencing, and metagenome sequencing for detecting pathogens in food [5,6,7] and environmental samples [8,9], and for infectious disease diagnostics in clinical settings [10,11,12,13]. These methods could offer lower costs, increased speed, and the potential to detect multiple pathogens in a single analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%