Application of activated charcoal radon collectors in high humidity environments

Iimoto, Takeshi; Tokonami, Shinji; Morishita, Yasuaki; Kosako, Toshiso

doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.03.037

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It has been explained that an absorbent's surface area, pore size, pore distribution, and type of pore are critical factors in the performance of absorption (Iimoto et al 2005). An absorbent with uniform pore size yields faster diffusion of particles and better absorption performance (Ebie et al 2001;Wanping et al 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Radon Absorption Capacity of Carbonized Boards from Different Wood-based Panels

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The radon absorption performance was determined and compared for different types of carbonized boards to establish effective carbonized boards. Moreover, the absorption mechanism of carbonized boards was investigated by specific surface area and pore size in each of the carbonized boards. The radon absorption performance was ranked in the following order: ash (87%), medium-density fiberboard (MDF, 83%), oriented strand board (OSB, 82%), particleboard (PB, 77%), and plywood (PW, 67%). The correlation between radon absorption capacity and surface area or pore volume showed that a higher surface area or pore volume had higher radon absorption performance. However, the highest surface area and pore volume was detected on carbonized MDF, which had a radon absorption performance that was 5% less than carbonized ash board. Therefore, the surface area and pore volume as well as other factors affected the absorption performance.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%