2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-015-9612-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Framework to a Turbulent Buoyant Helium Plume

Abstract: A framework for verification and validation/uncertainty quantification of largescale, highly coupled, complex processes is presented. Steps in the framework include code and solution verification, development of an input/uncertainty map, definition of evaluation criteria, development of a surrogate model, performance of a consistency analysis (a mathematical statement limiting error), and the feed forward and feedback of information gain from the analysis. This framework is applied to a turbulent, buoyant, 1 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 According to the modeling technique in different domains, a lot of verification and validation (V&V) frameworks have been proposed for domain model assessment. [35][36][37] They summarized the critical issues of a domain model, integrated particular verification tools, and included several statistical tests to implement a complete evaluation process. Basically, these frameworks are domain-dependent.…”
Section: The Overall Framework Of Model Credibility Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 According to the modeling technique in different domains, a lot of verification and validation (V&V) frameworks have been proposed for domain model assessment. [35][36][37] They summarized the critical issues of a domain model, integrated particular verification tools, and included several statistical tests to implement a complete evaluation process. Basically, these frameworks are domain-dependent.…”
Section: The Overall Framework Of Model Credibility Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum grid spacing used by Maragkos et al [10] was 1.23 cm, with a maximum spacing of 5.39 cm, resulting in a puffing frequency of 1.41 Hz with an SGS model and 1.31 Hz without an SGS model. More recently, Jatale et al [11] presented and applied a framework for uncertainty quantification to the 1 m diameter helium plume using the experimental data and LES.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buoyancy-driven flows are ubiquitous in nature and engineering, spanning natural phenomena as diverse as thermals in the ocean, volcanic plumes, and wildland fires, as well as engineering applications such as flue gas systems and burners for industrial processing. With the increasing availability and decreasing cost of high performance computing resources, numerical simulations are being used more and more to study these flows, in particular using large eddy (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]) and direct numerical (e.g., [1,6]) simulations (LES and DNS, respectively). However, prior attempts to reproduce experimental results for larger-scale buoyancy-driven flows, particularly in the context of LES for meterscale plumes and pool fires [12], have proven difficult, limiting the use of simulations for the understanding and design of many real-world systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach developed by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) is the standard for verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer [7]. The boundto-bound consistency analysis approach was developed by Frenklach and coworkers [8] and used by Oberkampf and Roy [1], Jatale et al [9,10], and Schroeder [11]. A six-step framework for validation of computer models called simulator assessment and validation engine (SAVE) was developed by the National Institute of Statistical Sciences group [12].…”
Section: Description Of Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Appmentioning
confidence: 99%