2020
DOI: 10.3389/fams.2020.571544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Susceptible, Infectious, and/or Recovered (SIR) Model to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ecuador

Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is wreaking havoc in healthcare systems worldwide. COVID-19 was reported for the first time in Wuhan (China) and the first case in Ecuador was confirmed on February 27, 2020. Several determinants are taken into consideration for the establishment of asymptomatic or critical illness, and are necessary to predict the dynamics and behavior of a pandemic. We generated a Susceptible, Infectious, and/or Recovered model and reflected upon the COVID-19 pandemic in Ecuad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the result presented in this investigation would explain a high wave of infection in the country. Therefore, the R o was higher than the one found by [49], who established a value of 2.2 with 88% of susceptible/infected individuals. The R o estimates for COVID-19, including the study R o , were higher than the R o values estimated for epidemics caused by coronaviruses that had high dissemination at the beginning of the century and the previous decade, such as the cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) spread in Beijing, China, at the end of 2002 that affected at least 37 countries, with an estimated R 0 between 2.2 to 4.91, and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) of 2012 had an R 0 between 0.29 and 0.80 in 27 countries [44,[50][51][52].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In other words, the result presented in this investigation would explain a high wave of infection in the country. Therefore, the R o was higher than the one found by [49], who established a value of 2.2 with 88% of susceptible/infected individuals. The R o estimates for COVID-19, including the study R o , were higher than the R o values estimated for epidemics caused by coronaviruses that had high dissemination at the beginning of the century and the previous decade, such as the cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) spread in Beijing, China, at the end of 2002 that affected at least 37 countries, with an estimated R 0 between 2.2 to 4.91, and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) of 2012 had an R 0 between 0.29 and 0.80 in 27 countries [44,[50][51][52].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…However, this revealed a lack of adequate communication about the rationale for vaccination and its slow and progressive impact on the pandemic behavior. For example, in the particular case of Ecuador, an early SIR model showed that herd immunity will require vaccination of at least 55% of the population ( 24 ). However, in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, a global survey about optimism over the COVID-19 outbreak coming to an end showed that European and Asian countries had a more negative view of the situation and became even more pessimistic as time passed, compared to countries such as Brazil and Mexico that had a more optimistic view about the situation ( 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Lotka-Volterra model was used to study the marine phage population dynamics (e.g., [47]) or the stability of the model with time-varying delays (e.g., [48]) or changes in the density of a population in community ecology resulting from this model (e.g., [49]). There are applications of other models considered in this paper, with the applications of the SIR model to the COVID-19 pandemic being both interesting and relevant (e.g., [50,51]). Additional insights in these studies can be gained by constructing their standard Lagrangians using the method presented in Section 2.3.…”
Section: Applications To Real-world Ecological Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%