2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a statistical technique for olive oil mill wastewater treatment using ultrafiltration process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the advanced oxidation methods are very effective, but they also have high costs. Besides, the treatment of OMW by a combination of chemical or physical processes and a biological process has not been completely successful, and a longer lag phase has been found to be necessary for biological treatment [62,63]. In addition, reuse of the OMW by spreading onto agricultural soil as an organic fertilizer has been considered [60].…”
Section: Olive Mill Waste Water Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the advanced oxidation methods are very effective, but they also have high costs. Besides, the treatment of OMW by a combination of chemical or physical processes and a biological process has not been completely successful, and a longer lag phase has been found to be necessary for biological treatment [62,63]. In addition, reuse of the OMW by spreading onto agricultural soil as an organic fertilizer has been considered [60].…”
Section: Olive Mill Waste Water Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This waste is usually treated by a number of physical, chemical and biological techniques in water treatment units of oil refinery, before being disposed in environment or reused as agricultural water. One of the treatment techniques used for oil separation from wastewater is membrane filtration (Karakuleski et al 1995;Marchese et al 2000;Tomaszewska et al 2005;Akdemir & Ozer 2008). applied for treating oily wastewaters (Koltuniewicz et al 1995;Kim 1997;Marchese et al 2000;Madaeni et al 2001;Mohammadi & Esmaeelifar 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transmembrane pressure, COD removal and the permeate flux were used as variables. Optimal fluxes (34.4 L/m 2 /h) and removal rates (89.5% of COD) were at opposite ends of flowrate and pressure ranges (Akdemir and Ozer, 2008).…”
Section: Fruits and Vegetablesmentioning
confidence: 97%