2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a statistical post-processing technique to a gridded, operational, air quality forecast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We revisit the June 2013 haze episode and apply a bias correction scheme to hourly PM 10 model time series for Singapore. Real‐time bias correction based on observations can be used to improve operational air quality and pollutant dispersion forecasts [e.g., Borrego et al , ; Neal et al , ]. Systematic and random model errors introduced, for example, by regionally varying uncertainties in emissions or NWP skill can be addressed through such a correction process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We revisit the June 2013 haze episode and apply a bias correction scheme to hourly PM 10 model time series for Singapore. Real‐time bias correction based on observations can be used to improve operational air quality and pollutant dispersion forecasts [e.g., Borrego et al , ; Neal et al , ]. Systematic and random model errors introduced, for example, by regionally varying uncertainties in emissions or NWP skill can be addressed through such a correction process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present-day concentrations for the UK were generated by the Met Office operational air quality forecast model AQUM [25], operated in a hindcast mode. The raw model hourly output data were combined with corresponding hourly surface air pollution measurements by the technique described in [26], to produce improved estimates of pollutant concentrations over the whole UK. The model operates at a spatial resolution of 12km and does not explicitly resolve the fine structure of emissions in urban areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, using reanalysis data and reforecasting using the current model, or blend of models, is a possibility for further improvement (Hamill et al, 2015). In the short term, a variety of bias correction techniques have been used (Delle Monache et al, 2008;Kang et al, 2008;Neal et al, 2014). In 2015, a Kalman filter/analogue technique was tested for PM 2.5 model forecasts (Djalalova et al, 2015).…”
Section: Conclusion: the Future Forecast Rotementioning
confidence: 99%