2022
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a parallel laser apparatus to measure forearms and flanges of wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii)

Abstract: We constructed a parallel laser photogrammetry apparatus constructed from commercially available parts, and measured forearm lengths and flange widths of 16 wild Bornean orangutans. Our objectives were to validate our method and apparatus, discuss issues encountered, and construct preliminary growth curves.For adult males, we also compared flange width to forearm length as a way to investigate the relationship between body size and flange development. We used a camera cage around a DSLR camera, on top of which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For future studies, we suggest that the researchers determine a maximum error value for interobserver reliability before using the measurements for subsequent analyses; this value will be context-dependent and take into consideration the study species and the number of observers. Nevertheless, the interobserver error rates among the rest of the sample population (x̄= 4.08%) remained relatively low and consistent with previous studies: 3.62% across anatomy in mantled howler monkeys Barrickman et al (2015) and 4.74% across anatomy in Bornean orangutans (Brown et al, 2022). Both of these studies also show that error rate is higher for smaller anatomy compared to larger anatomy.…”
Section: Measurement Repeatability and Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For future studies, we suggest that the researchers determine a maximum error value for interobserver reliability before using the measurements for subsequent analyses; this value will be context-dependent and take into consideration the study species and the number of observers. Nevertheless, the interobserver error rates among the rest of the sample population (x̄= 4.08%) remained relatively low and consistent with previous studies: 3.62% across anatomy in mantled howler monkeys Barrickman et al (2015) and 4.74% across anatomy in Bornean orangutans (Brown et al, 2022). Both of these studies also show that error rate is higher for smaller anatomy compared to larger anatomy.…”
Section: Measurement Repeatability and Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The between‐photo repeatability error (x̄ = 5.5%) in this study is comparable to that of other studies: average error ranged from 5.4% (glabella to rump) to 18.0% (distal hindlimb length) in mantled howler monkeys (Barrickman et al, 2015), 1.6%–5.1% (forearm length) and 3.5% (flange width) in Bornean orangutans (Brown et al, 2022), and 3.7% (forearm length) in Assamese macaques (Anzà et al, 2022). This relatively low error suggests that even if the same individuals were photographed from varying angles, distances, and light conditions, similar estimates of testes size were produced.…”
Section: Comparison and Critiquesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations