2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01030.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a new cleavage fracture criterion for fracture toughness prediction for RPV steels

Abstract: A B S T R A C T In the present paper, approaches for prediction of cleavage fracture proposed by authors over recent years are briefly reviewed. A new local criterion of cleavage fracture and its application are considered. Local criterion of cleavage fracture formulated in a probabilistic manner consists of cleavage microcrack nucleation condition and condition for their start and propagation through various barriers such as microstresses, grain and dislocation substructure boundaries. As distinct from univer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, Charpy V-notch specimens for bending impact tests are used as reference specimens for the determination of brittle fracture resistance. Fracture toughness is usually determined based on the use of precracked Charpy specimens.At present, several methods are available for predicting the temperature dependence of fracture toughness for reactor pressure vessels; noteworthy among them are the Master Curve (MC) method [3,4] and the Unified Curve (UC) method [7,8], which were proposed based on a probabilistic model for the fracture toughness prediction [5,6]. The last-mentioned method allows for a change in trend of the K T Jc ( ) curve with increasing degree of embrittlement of a material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, Charpy V-notch specimens for bending impact tests are used as reference specimens for the determination of brittle fracture resistance. Fracture toughness is usually determined based on the use of precracked Charpy specimens.At present, several methods are available for predicting the temperature dependence of fracture toughness for reactor pressure vessels; noteworthy among them are the Master Curve (MC) method [3,4] and the Unified Curve (UC) method [7,8], which were proposed based on a probabilistic model for the fracture toughness prediction [5,6]. The last-mentioned method allows for a change in trend of the K T Jc ( ) curve with increasing degree of embrittlement of a material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gurson model parameters described in the previous section has been used. From the unit-cell analysis the σ-ε response along the primary loading direction (22) for T=20 o C (room temperature) and the corresponding fit is obtained. To use the non-dimensional traction separation law parameters in FEM simulations, a cell height h needs to be prescribed.…”
Section: Unified Cohesive Zone Model (Czm) For Ductile To Brittle Framentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-local model eliminates the meshdependency typically observed in local strain-softening models. In addition to the Beremin model, a local stress based model in conjunction with Weibull distribution has also been proposed in [22] as a cleavage initiation indicator. Though these approaches have been able to capture the fracture toughness variability at and near lower shelf, an improved model consisting of both ductile and cleavage mode of crack growth is necessary to predict the entire DBT region accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When formulating the condition for the cleavage microcrack initiation (4a), it is assumed, as opposed to other dislocation models, that the geometry of the dislocation pileup depends on the plastic strain and temperature: the pileup blunting increases with temperature due to the cross sliding of dislocations at the head of the pileup; the pileup length decreases with increasing strain through the formation of a dislocation substructure [18][19][20]27]. This approach assumes a dependence of the m Tε coefficient on temperature T and plastic strain:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%