2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.104066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Moving Particle Semi-Implicit Numerical Wave Flume (MPS-NWF) to model design waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, such a method is subject to strong numerical instabilities. Suppression of spurious numerical oscillations requires the introduction of corrective terms in the original PPE [23,18]. For example, the recent MPS method of [23] uses two error-compensating terms in the PPE to improve numerical stability, enabling the model to reproduce design waves of practical interest with a 1% root-mean-square (RMS) error with respect to experimental data.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Usually, such a method is subject to strong numerical instabilities. Suppression of spurious numerical oscillations requires the introduction of corrective terms in the original PPE [23,18]. For example, the recent MPS method of [23] uses two error-compensating terms in the PPE to improve numerical stability, enabling the model to reproduce design waves of practical interest with a 1% root-mean-square (RMS) error with respect to experimental data.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppression of spurious numerical oscillations requires the introduction of corrective terms in the original PPE [23,18]. For example, the recent MPS method of [23] uses two error-compensating terms in the PPE to improve numerical stability, enabling the model to reproduce design waves of practical interest with a 1% root-mean-square (RMS) error with respect to experimental data. A drawback of [23]'s model is the significant computational time needed by the semi-implicit scheme, and the presence of empirical pressure parameters that require tuning.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations