2013
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a modified Neff classification to patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis

Abstract: Our mNeff classification allowed selected patients with AD to be successfully managed in an outpatient programme.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2013 Mora Lopez et al proposed [ 15 ] a modification of the previous Neff classification dividing Neff stage 1 into stage 1 a (localized pneumoperitoneum in the form of air bubbles) and 1 b abscess (<4 cm): Stage 0 Uncomplicated diverticulitis. Diverticula, thickening of the wall, increased density of the pericolic fat Stage 1 Locally complicated diverticulitis Stage 1a Localized pneumoperitoneum in the form of air bubbles Stage 1b Abscess (<4 cm) Stage 2 Complicated diverticulitis with pelvic abscess.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013 Mora Lopez et al proposed [ 15 ] a modification of the previous Neff classification dividing Neff stage 1 into stage 1 a (localized pneumoperitoneum in the form of air bubbles) and 1 b abscess (<4 cm): Stage 0 Uncomplicated diverticulitis. Diverticula, thickening of the wall, increased density of the pericolic fat Stage 1 Locally complicated diverticulitis Stage 1a Localized pneumoperitoneum in the form of air bubbles Stage 1b Abscess (<4 cm) Stage 2 Complicated diverticulitis with pelvic abscess.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HS classification (Hansen & Stock, 1999) was used predominantly in Germany while other countries preferred Neff's classification. Siewert (1995), Ambrosetti (2002), and Tursi (2008) suggested simplified classifications while a group from the Netherlands favored a more complex and sophisticated approach (Klarenbeck, 2012) [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Classification Of Diverticular Disease - Now and Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple other classification systems available for AD which include the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, modified Neff, Ambrosetti, Kohler, Hansen/Stock, Siewart, Boostrom and the Cleveland Clinic diverticular disease propensity score [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ], but they are in less common usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%