1995
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199509000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Method for Estimating Day of Ovulation Using Urinary Estrogen and Progesterone Metabolites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is highly concordant with the use of midcycle surge of urinary LH and has comparable accuracy [28,29]. Its precision is similar to that of serum LH determination [30]. The method has recently been validated in a large sample of cycles using ultrasound evidence of follicular rupture [31].…”
Section: Hormone Assays and Hormonal Identification Of Ovulation And mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This method is highly concordant with the use of midcycle surge of urinary LH and has comparable accuracy [28,29]. Its precision is similar to that of serum LH determination [30]. The method has recently been validated in a large sample of cycles using ultrasound evidence of follicular rupture [31].…”
Section: Hormone Assays and Hormonal Identification Of Ovulation And mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The correlations between serum and urine measures in these EIAs compared favorably to those for widely used urinary EIAs (Table 6). Urinary PDG and E1C lagged behind serum by 1 day, on average, but they exhibited some slight pattern differences, with E1C lagging farther behind serum than PDG; these lag patterns need to be taken into consideration in algorithms that estimate day of ovulation (39 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Premenopausal women, who had not taken any type of hormones, been pregnant, or breast-fed in the previous 6 months (n = 18,521), provided an initial 15-mL blood sample drawn on the third to fifth day of their menstrual cycle ( follicular blood draw) and a second 30-mL blood sample drawn 7 to 9 days before the anticipated start of their next cycle (luteal blood draw). We counted the timing of the luteal sample from the estimated first day of the woman's next menstrual cycle, as this generally is more accurate than counting forward from day 1 of the current cycle (22,23). Follicular samples were placed in a refrigerator for 8 to 24 hours by the participant; then, she aliquoted the plasma into a labeled cryotube included in the blood collection kit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%