2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a ceramic membrane contacting process for ozone and peroxone treatment of micropollutant contaminated surface water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the addition of 15 µM H2O2 the pCBA removal showed a small increase in all four water matrices tested. Similar results have been observed in a membrane contacting system employing a ceramic membrane, where the peroxone process increased the removal of pCBA in river water by less than 10% [53]. A higher improvement of pCBA removal has been observed by H2O2 addition in batch experiments [49,54].…”
Section: Overall Ozone Mass Transfer Coefficient and Molar Flux Throusupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the addition of 15 µM H2O2 the pCBA removal showed a small increase in all four water matrices tested. Similar results have been observed in a membrane contacting system employing a ceramic membrane, where the peroxone process increased the removal of pCBA in river water by less than 10% [53]. A higher improvement of pCBA removal has been observed by H2O2 addition in batch experiments [49,54].…”
Section: Overall Ozone Mass Transfer Coefficient and Molar Flux Throusupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A higher improvement of pCBA removal has been observed by H2O2 addition in batch experiments [49,54]. The difference between the conventional (batch) peroxone process and the membrane peroxone process can be attributed to the non-uniform concentration of ozone in the membrane, which influences the O3:H2O2 ratio and thus the OH radical yield [53]. Adjusting flow conditions or membrane diameter to achieve a more uniform ozone concentration profile might diminish this discrepancy.…”
Section: Overall Ozone Mass Transfer Coefficient and Molar Flux Throumentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In pure buffered water the addition of H2O2 did not lead to a significant increase in pCBA removal ( Figure 4a). Similar results have been observed in a membrane contacting system employing a ceramic membrane, where the peroxone process increased the removal of pCBA in river water by less than 10 % [52]. A higher improvement of pCBA removal has been observed by H2O2 addition in batch experiments [48,53].…”
Section: Removal Of Pcba By Membrane Ozonation and In Presence Of Addsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, if high levels of bromide ions are present in the effluent, ozonation can lead to the generation of bromate, which has been proved to act as a carcinogen [80].…”
Section: Ozonationmentioning
confidence: 99%