2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Bayesian hierarchical modeling for risk assessment of accidents at hydropower dams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 522 new accidents were added to the dam accident data set compared to the 569 already existing accidents (Kalinina et al, 2018a(Kalinina et al, , 2018b. One reason for this substantial increase in the number of records is related to the availability of new information sources (e.g., NPDP, 2016), which were not accessible during previous updates.…”
Section: Data Collection and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In total, 522 new accidents were added to the dam accident data set compared to the 569 already existing accidents (Kalinina et al, 2018a(Kalinina et al, , 2018b. One reason for this substantial increase in the number of records is related to the availability of new information sources (e.g., NPDP, 2016), which were not accessible during previous updates.…”
Section: Data Collection and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been extensively discussed in the literature (Eckle & Burgherr, 2013;Gelman, Carlin, Stern, & Rubin, 2003) and has been successfully adopted in other fields (Coles & Powell, 1996). An application of this modeling approach for analysis of hydropower dam accidents (with fatalities) was demonstrated in an earlier work by the authors (Kalinina, Spada, & Burgherr, 2016;Kalinina, Spada, & Burgherr, 2018a). In a Bayesian hierarchical model, accident data is treated in the form of a multilevel system with subsets sharing specific characteristics (e.g., accident cause or infrastructure type).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in [20], credibility intervals (e.g., 5-95%) were firstly constructed for point estimates using a Chi-square distribution [21]; however, without considering that the uncertainty is a combination, among others, of epistemic and aleatory factors [22]. In order to consider a more complex uncertainty assessment, [13,[23][24][25] analysed the risk of accidents in different energy chains chains using a Bayesian inference. In this way, the authors could estimate the risk indicators and their uncertainties, since the latter is intrinsically assessed through a Bayesian approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accidents due to a high level of energy being stored in the reservoir will give a negative impact on the downstream area and have disastrous effects on environment, society and economy [2]. Provision of a hydraulically efficient and structurally strong discharge structure is very significant for the safety of the dam, the life and property along the river down below [3][4][5]. It is crucial that these structures are optimized functionally and economically in the individual project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface spillway and the bottom outlet can be utilized to release the surplus flood. The dam is a roller-compacted concrete gravity dam with a maximum height of 120 m, a crest length of 727 m and a reservoir capacity of 572 million m 3 . The powerhouse at the dam toe is installed with a capacity of 150,000 KW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%