2018
DOI: 10.24384/000470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a 10 week coaching program designed to facilitate volitional personality change: Overall effects on personality and the impact of targeting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our findings found that the GFP was an important individual factor influencing students' moral hypocrisy. Although less likely to shape students' personalities directly at this age, it is still possible for educational practitioners to use digital-coaching interventions (Allemand & Flückiger, 2022) and the face-to-face coaching program (Allan et al, 2018) to shape students' implicit theories of personality (e.g., growth mindsets training; Dweck, 2006), and thus prevent moral hypocrisy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our findings found that the GFP was an important individual factor influencing students' moral hypocrisy. Although less likely to shape students' personalities directly at this age, it is still possible for educational practitioners to use digital-coaching interventions (Allemand & Flückiger, 2022) and the face-to-face coaching program (Allan et al, 2018) to shape students' implicit theories of personality (e.g., growth mindsets training; Dweck, 2006), and thus prevent moral hypocrisy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies have also shown effects of interventions in nonclinical populations (e.g., Allemand et al, 2022; Hudson et al, 2019; Hudson & Fraley, 2015; Stieger et al, 2021; Stieger, Wepfer, et al, 2020; see Jackson et al, 2021, for a review). For instance, generating specific implementation intentions (i.e., “if-then” plans) for personality change goals (Hudson & Fraley, 2015), completing behavioral challenges (Hudson et al, 2019; Massey-Abernathy & Robinson, 2021), or following a coaching program aimed at learning strategies to behave in trait-consistent manners (Allan et al, 2018; Martin et al, 2014; Massey-Abernathy & Robinson, 2021) resulted in significant trait change over the course of a few months.…”
Section: Personality Trait Change Through Psychological Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the taxonomy has to group constructs that are malleable, i.e., represent skills that show developmental patterns. This development could be normative (e.g., teachers getting on average more emotionally stable with increasing age), or through intentional or volitional change Fraley, 2015, 2016;Allan et al, 2018) [element c], either individually (e.g., individual learning and coaching) or group-based (in the context of pre-and in-service training programs [element d]). Skills in our taxonomy are assumed to be malleable and to improve over time, training sessions, and experience/tenure which is consistent with evidence from SEMS training programs in teachers (Dignath et al, 2008;Payton et al, 2008).…”
Section: Towards a Unifying Teacher Sems Taxonomy Taxonomic Prerequis...mentioning
confidence: 99%