Application of 3-Dimensional Printing in a Case of Osteogenesis Imperfecta for Patient Education, Anatomic Understanding, Preoperative Planning, and Intraoperative Evaluation

Eisenmenger, Laura; Wiggins, Richard H.; Fults, Daniel W.; Huo, Eugene

doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.026

Cited by 17 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Surgical replacement of tumor resection can be very complex. ICD-10: Q78.0 Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Q78.1 Polyostotic Fibrous Dysplasia PubMed Search: ((3D Printing) AND (Osteogenesis Imperfecta)) OR ((Rapid Prototyping) AND (Osteogenesis Imperfecta)) OR ((3D Printing) AND (Fibrous Dysplasia)) OR ((Rapid Prototyping) AND (Fibrous Dysplasia)) Results: [ 53 , 147 – 156 ] Dentofacial Anomalies Including Malocclusion : Dentofacial anomalies can include over or undergrowth of either the upper jaw (maxilla) or the lower jaw (mandible). Malocclusion happens when the teeth are not approximating in a way that allows for normal function and can be any combination of one jaw being smaller, larger or asymmetric as compared to the other.…”

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Medical three-dimensional (3D) printing has expanded dramatically over the past three decades with growth in both facility adoption and the variety of medical applications. Consideration for each step required to create accurate 3D printed models from medical imaging data impacts patient care and management. In this paper, a writing group representing the Radiological Society of North America Special Interest Group on 3D Printing (SIG) provides recommendations that have been vetted and voted on by the SIG active membership. This body of work includes appropriate clinical use of anatomic models 3D printed for diagnostic use in the care of patients with specific medical conditions. The recommendations provide guidance for approaches and tools in medical 3D printing, from image acquisition, segmentation of the desired anatomy intended for 3D printing, creation of a 3D-printable model, and post-processing of 3D printed anatomic models for patient care.

show abstract

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this context, digital anatomy research driven by clinical problems has established a new research dimension in this discipline. 3D-printed anatomy models not only function as a training tool for both health professionals and patients [ 38 , 39 ] but also advance the development of tissue engineering [ 40 - 42 ] and patient-specific medical devices [ 43 , 44 ], which have lifesaving potential for complex cases. Moreover, the digital processing of anatomical data provides a precise representation of the patient’s anatomy.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Opportunities and Challenges of Digital Anatomy for Medical Sciences: Narrative Review

Wickramasinghe¹,

Thompson²,

Xiao³

2022

JMIR Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Anatomy has been the cornerstone of medical education for centuries. However, given the advances in the Internet of Things, this landscape has been augmented in the past decade, shifting toward a greater focus on adopting digital technologies. Digital anatomy is emerging as a new discipline that represents an opportunity to embrace advances in digital health technologies and apply them to the domain of modern medical sciences. Notably, the use of augmented or mixed and virtual reality as well as mobile and platforms and 3D printing in modern anatomy has dramatically increased in the last 5 years. Objective This review aims to outline the emerging area of digital anatomy and summarize opportunities and challenges for incorporating digital anatomy in medical science education and practices. Methods Literature searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE bibliographic databases for research articles published between January 2005 and June 2021 (inclusive). Out of the 4650 articles, 651 (14%) were advanced to full-text screening and 77 (1.7%) were eligible for inclusion in the narrative review. We performed a Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat (SWOT) analysis to evaluate the role that digital anatomy plays in both the learning and teaching of medicine and health sciences as well as its practice. Results Digital anatomy has not only revolutionized undergraduate anatomy education via 3D reconstruction of the human body but is shifting the paradigm of pre- and vocational training for medical professionals via digital simulation, advancing health care. Importantly, it was noted that digital anatomy not only benefits in situ real time clinical practice but also has many advantages for learning and teaching clinicians at multiple levels. Using the SWOT analysis, we described strengths and opportunities that together serve to underscore the benefits of embracing digital anatomy, in particular the areas for collaboration and medical advances. The SWOT analysis also identified a few weaknesses associated with digital anatomy, which are primarily related to the fact that the current reach and range of applications for digital anatomy are very limited owing to its nascent nature. Furthermore, threats are limited to technical aspects such as hardware and software issues. Conclusions This review highlights the advances in digital health and Health 4.0 in key areas of digital anatomy analytics. The continuous evolution of digital technologies will increase their ability to reinforce anatomy knowledge and advance clinical practice. However, digital anatomy education should not be viewed as a simple technical conversion and needs an explicit pedagogical framework. This review will be a valuable asset for educators and researchers to incorporate digital anatomy into the learning and teaching of medical sciences and their practice.

show abstract

“…Whereas most case reports of 3-D printing for presurgical planning discuss the surgeon's use and subjective assessment of the model, fewer studies examine the patient's perception of the model and how it improved their comprehension of the proposed surgery [9–13]. Those studies that have evaluated the patient experience with 3-D models have generally shown positive results, including better understanding of their surgical treatment and localization of symptoms to a specific anatomic region [14]. In addition, direct benefits to patients with the use of 3-D models included reducing the time under anesthesia or tourniquet, minimizing blood loss, and reducing the amount of intraoperative imaging [15,16].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Imaging-Based 3-Dimensional Printing for Improved Maxillofacial Presurgical Planning: A Single Center Case Series

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose 3-D printing is an increasingly widespread technology that allows physical models to be constructed based on cross-sectional medical imaging data. We sought to develop a pipeline for production of 3-dimensional (3-D) models for presurgical planning and assess the value of these models for surgeons and patients. Methods In this institutional review board–approved, single-center case series, participating surgeons identified cases for 3-D model printing, and after obtaining patient consent, a 3-D model was produced for each of the 7 participating patients based on preoperative cross-sectional imaging. Each model was given to the surgeon to use during the surgical consent discussion and preoperative planning. Patients and surgeons completed questionnaires evaluating the quality and usefulness of the models. Results The 3-D models improved surgeon confidence in their operative approach, influencing the choice of operative approach in the majority of cases. Patients and surgeons reported that the model improved patient comprehension of the surgery during the consent discussion, including risks and benefits of the surgery. Model production time was as little as 4 days, and the average per-model cost was $350. Conclusions 3-D printed models are useful presurgical tools from both surgeon and patient perspectives. Development of local hospital-based 3-D printing capabilities enables model production with rapid turnaround and modest cost, representing a value-added service for radiologists to offer their surgical colleagues.

show abstract

Application of 3-Dimensional Printing in a Case of Osteogenesis Imperfecta for Patient Education, Anatomic Understanding, Preoperative Planning, and Intraoperative Evaluation

Cited by 17 publications

References 18 publications

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios

The Opportunities and Challenges of Digital Anatomy for Medical Sciences: Narrative Review

Imaging-Based 3-Dimensional Printing for Improved Maxillofacial Presurgical Planning: A Single Center Case Series

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About