2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10712-017-9435-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of 3-D Electromagnetic Inversion in Practice: Challenges, Pitfalls and Solution Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best-fit model (model S2) is shown in Figs 10 and 11 (see Table 1 The single RMS value of the best fitting model is not sufficient to judge its quality (Tietze & Ritter 2013;Miensopust 2017). Instead, the results were evaluated based on the convergence (see Fig.…”
Section: Stage Ii: 3-d Large-scale Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best-fit model (model S2) is shown in Figs 10 and 11 (see Table 1 The single RMS value of the best fitting model is not sufficient to judge its quality (Tietze & Ritter 2013;Miensopust 2017). Instead, the results were evaluated based on the convergence (see Fig.…”
Section: Stage Ii: 3-d Large-scale Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough overview of how data errors, data components inverted and grid rotation affect 3D inversion has been conducted by Tietze and Ritter (2013), and a recent review of 3D modelling in practice by Miensopust (2017) exists, along with an investigation into some ModEM3DMT parameters (Slezak et al 2019); however, as of yet, an in-depth overview of the many other modelling parameters that affect the resultant model is not available, and some of these will be investigated throughout this manuscript, specific to the 3D inversion code, ModEM3DMT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial smoothing parameter δy was increased from 0.1 to 0.5. A larger spatial smoothing parameter promotes smoothing and longer structures along that direction (Miensopust, ). The RMS variations of the iterations are shown in Figures b–d.…”
Section: Robustness Evaluation Of Features In the Resistivity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%