Monitoring the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Sourse Location 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8250-7_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of 3-D Crustal and Upper Mantle Velocity Model of North America for Location of Regional Seismic Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major research effort is currently underway (e.g. Firbas 2000; Group‐2 Calibration Consortium 2000; Ryaboy et al 2001) to calibrate the IMS seismic network with station corrections derived from regional and global 3‐D velocity models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major research effort is currently underway (e.g. Firbas 2000; Group‐2 Calibration Consortium 2000; Ryaboy et al 2001) to calibrate the IMS seismic network with station corrections derived from regional and global 3‐D velocity models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have demonstrated that regional path calibration is essential for obtaining accurate locations of seismic events at all magnitudes (RUSSIAN FEDER-ATION/UNITED STATES CALIBRATION WORKING GROUP, 1998;SAIKIA et al, 1996a, b;THIO et al, 1999;ZHU et al, 1997;RYABOY, 1999). Accurate locations are integral to Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) seismic monitoring eorts, particularly for smaller events, and are also crucial to many types of calibration studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate locations are integral to Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) seismic monitoring eorts, particularly for smaller events, and are also crucial to many types of calibration studies. RYABOY (1999) has demonstrated that applying corrections for regionalized velocity models to the travel times of regional phases from nuclear explosions reduces location errors signi®cantly, putting the relocations on par with announced event locations. Smaller (M < 5) events may only be recorded by a few stations, often with poor azimuthal coverage; consequently their hypocenter error ellipses can be extremely large, especially when located by only a few teleseismic observations (BONDA Â R, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%