2020
DOI: 10.1159/000506379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of 17 Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Risk Prediction Models

Abstract: Introduction: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a frequent complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Various groups have developed and validated risk scores for CI-AKI. Although the majority of these risk scores achieve an adequate accuracy, their usability in clinical practice is limited and greatly debated. Objective: With the present study, we aimed to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of recently published CI-AKI risk scores (up to 2018) in a cohort of patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Published predictive models for CI-AKI are not excelling and show conflicting results in external validation studies. [31,32] An interesting common aspect is the high NPV, as seen in our study. We applied two scored based models and saw an increment in AUC by including urinary NGAL/creatinine ratios.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Published predictive models for CI-AKI are not excelling and show conflicting results in external validation studies. [31,32] An interesting common aspect is the high NPV, as seen in our study. We applied two scored based models and saw an increment in AUC by including urinary NGAL/creatinine ratios.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In 2004, Mehran et al ( 49 ) proposed one the first objective risk score for CI-AKI risk combining eight variables: systolic blood pressure < 80 mm Hg, intra-aortic balloon pump, NYHA class III/IV, age >75 years, anemia defined by baseline hematocrit value <39% for men and <36% for women, diabetes mellitus, CM volume (1 point for every 100 ml) and estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (more points for more severe reduction of kidney function). This risk score is presently used in many catheterization laboratories and has been repeatedly externally validated ( 50 , 51 ). The risk score by Mehran et al involves some parameters that can be obtained only during the procedure and make the clinical application of the score challenging.…”
Section: Risk Stratification and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three risk models showed less discrimination capability. Perhaps, due to the difference in CA-AKI definition from the original studies 9,22,25 . Because c-statistics is a function of sensitivity and specificity of risk score, differences in the definition of CA-AKI can affect its value 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third external validation exhibited a low capability of discriminating power with c-statistic 0.502, even though the study was performed in the same setting as in the first external validation at different times (Supplementary Table 2A.) 9 . Our finding also demonstrated low discriminatory ability with c-statistic 0.530 in Tziakas' model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation