Application layer protocols for the Internet of Things: A survey

Yassein, Muneer Bani; Shatnawi, Mohammed Q.; Al-zoubi, Dua'

doi:10.1109/icemis.2016.7745303

Cited by 107 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The most important features in CoAP are simplicity and reliability, since it supports unicast and multicast request by taking advantage of UDP and provides the ability to asynchronous message exchanges. CoAP is a single protocol with two layers, ie, the first layer is the messaging layer and the second one is the request/response layer; messaging layer aims to achieve reliability based on UDP, while request/response layer aims to act the interactions and communication …”

Section: Internet Of Thingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of node centrality for IoT device selection in opportunistic networks: A comparison study

Cuka

Elmazi

Bylykbashi

et al. 2018

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Opportunistic networks (Oppnets) are a subclass of delay‐tolerant networks where communication opportunities (contacts) are intermittent and there is no need to establish an end‐to‐end link between communication nodes. The Internet of Things (IoT) presents the notion of large networks of connected devices, sharing data about their environments and creating a diverse ecosystem of sensors, actuators, and computing nodes. IoT networks consist of heterogeneous collections of resource constrained nodes that closely interact with their environment. There are different issues for these networks. One of them is the selection of IoT devices to carry out a task in Oppnets. In this work, we implement and compare two fuzzy‐based systems (FBSs) for selecting the IoT device that completes the task in Oppnets. We call these systems FBSIDS1 and FBSIDS2. For FBSIDS1, we use three input parameters: IoT device storage, IoT device waiting time (IDWT), and IoT device remaining energy. The output parameter is IoT device selection decision. For FBSIDS2, we consider four input parameters by adding IoT device node centrality (IDNC) as a new parameter. Comparing the complexity of FBSIDS1 and FBSIDS2, FBSIDS2 is more complex than FBSIDS1. However, FBSIDS2 is more flexible and makes a better selection of IoT devices than FBSIDS1. The simulation results show that IoT device selection is increased up to 33% and 71% by increasing IDNC and IDWT, respectively, for FBSIDS2, and up to 46% and 61% by increasing IDWT and IDNC, respectively, for FBSIDS1.

show abstract

Section: Internet Of Thingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of node centrality for IoT device selection in opportunistic networks: A comparison study

Cuka

Elmazi

Bylykbashi

et al. 2018

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this protocol, one message is encrypted and is published to several other nodes which are made possible using broadcast encryption method. Another session layer protocol to achieve significant packet overhead and low power consumption is through Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) discussed by V. Karagiannis [18]. This protocol helps in usage of RESTful (Representation State Transfer) services to meet the power limitations and to interface with standard HTTP protocol.…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These layers are discussed in detail in various papers by different authors, including the protocols used with respect to each layer and the type of network involved in the communication. Karagiannis [18] and K. Malar [10] discussed on application layer protocols, thrashing out few standard protocols based on reliability, security and energy consumption aspects. A detailed insight of IOT technologies and protocols are proposed by Fuqaha [7] and X. Che [2].…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some of these protocols are discussed here. V. Karagiannis [18] and D.Locke [24] suggested that MQTT protocol is well suited for IOT keeping in mind the issues related to reliability, security and energy consumption. It provides one to many communications and reduced packet overhead.…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This protocol helps in usage of RESTful (Representation State Transfer) services to meet the power limitations and to interface with standard HTTP protocol. XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) proposed by V. Karagiannis [18] is a rarely used session layer protocol designed for extensive messaging and chatting purposes. This is not suitable for Machine to Machine communication due to heavy overload.…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Strategies to handle heterogeneity prevalent within an IOT based network

Pavithra¹,

Sastry²

2018

IJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the most important features of an IOT network is heterogeneity among the devices, subnets, communication systems, data storage and retrieval. IOT can be conceived to be in existence in hierarchal structure having situated in many layers. In each of the layer there is an element of heterogeneity. The heterogeneity is more severe in the layer which deals with real connect and communication.In this paper different strategies are explored for handling heterogeneity among communication protocols that are used for effecting communication among devices, cluster of devices and the alike

show abstract