Application-derived communication protocol selection in M2M platforms for smart cities

Elmangoush, Asma; Steinke, Ronald; Magedanz, Thomas; Corici, Andreea Ancuta; Bourreau, Alex; Al-Hezmi, Adel

doi:10.1109/icin.2015.7073810

Cited by 14 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Trimpe and Baumann 4 showed an event‐based approach that autonomous control the IoT network, providing seamless integration to keep the network healthy and operative throughout time. Intelligent communication management is considered by Elmangoush et al, 13 which proposed an Adaptable Machine‐to‐Machine Transport (AdM2M) to make the selection of communication protocols for a given monitoring case. The authors show that adaptable communication settings in IoT platforms can be application oriented and traffic oriented.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Autonomic management of group communication for Internet of Things applications

Riker

Mota

Rosário

et al. 2022

Int J Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dense Internet of Things (DIoT) is fazed by message loss, congestion, and energy consumption, due to a large number of connected devices. One of the main challenges in DIoT environments is to achieve self-adaptable communication without human intervention, where the system is able to dynamically manage its own settings to mitigate common problems. Seeking to promote self-adaptability in DIoT, this paper presents the Autonomic management of GRoup communication for intErnEt of thiNgs applications (AGREEN). It is an autonomous solution for IoT platforms that configures the communication settings to ensure the dynamic control of IoT devices considering a comprehensive set of aspects, such as traffic loss, sensing relevance, amount of energy harvested, and the number of monitoring nodes with renewable and nonrenewable energy. Extensive evaluation results show that AGREEN is able to autonomously change the number of nodes in the monitoring group and to improve system performance in terms of message loss, energy consumption, and communication interval compared to standard protocols designed for IoT.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Autonomic management of group communication for Internet of Things applications

Riker

Mota

Rosário

et al. 2022

Int J Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…MQTT was evaluated in [18]. Thangavel et al [57] proposed a common middleware to abstract from CoAP and MQTT.…”

Section: Performance Evaluation Of Coap and Mqttmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Later, CoAP implementations have been assessed in comparison to HTTP [39] or on different hardware architectures [35]. MQTT was evaluated in [18]. Thangavel et al [57] proposed a common middleware to abstract from CoAP and MQTT.…”

Section: Performance Evaluation Of Coap and Mqttmentioning

confidence: 99%

NDN, CoAP, and MQTT

Gündoğan

Kietzmann

Lenders

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper takes a comprehensive view on the protocol stacks that are under debate for a future Internet of Things (IoT). It addresses the holistic question of which solution is beneficial for common IoT use cases. We deploy NDN and the two popular IP-based application protocols, CoAP and MQTT, in its different variants on a large-scale IoT testbed in single-and multi-hop scenarios. We analyze the use cases of scheduled periodic and unscheduled traffic under varying loads. Our findings indicate that (a) NDN admits the most resource-friendly deployment on nodes, and (b) shows superior robustness and resilience in multi-hop scenarios, while (c) the IP protocols operate at less overhead and higher speed in single-hop deployments. Most strikingly we find that NDN-based protocols are in significantly better flow balance than the UDP-based IP protocols and require fewer corrective actions.

show abstract

“…Machine to Machine (M2M) communication aims to enable seamless integration of physical and virtual objects into larger and geographically distributed enterprises by eliminating the need for human intervention. To achieve so, enforcing harmony and collaboration among different communication layers (physical, transport, presentation, application) and approaches used by devices for message storage and passing can be challenging [59].…”

Section: Transport and Application Layermentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet of Things: an overview

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As technology proceeds and the number of smart devices continues to grow substantially, need for ubiquitous context-aware platforms that support interconnected, heterogeneous, and distributed network of devices has given rise to what is referred today as Internet-of-Things. However, paving the path for achieving aforementioned objectives and making the IoT paradigm more tangible requires integration and convergence of different knowledge and research domains, covering aspects from identification and communication to resource discovery and service integration. Through this chapter, we aim to highlight researches in topics including proposed architectures, security and privacy, network communication means and protocols, and eventually conclude by providing future directions and open challenges facing the IoT development.

show abstract

Application-derived communication protocol selection in M2M platforms for smart cities

Cited by 14 publications

References 59 publications

Autonomic management of group communication for Internet of Things applications

Autonomic management of group communication for Internet of Things applications

NDN, CoAP, and MQTT

Internet of Things: an overview

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About