2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application date as a controlling factor of pesticide transfers to surface water during runoff events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the simulation of triazine herbicides was affected by pesticide availability in the runoff interaction layer which was mainly influenced by the application date, pesticide sorption, degradation rate, and timing of rainfall event. This finding is in agreement with a study by Boithias et al (2014) who carried out a sensitivity study for SWAT using plausible ranges of application dates for two contrasting pre-emergence herbicides; the authors showed that the effect of the application date was a pesticide-specific factor influenced by their bioavailability.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the simulation of triazine herbicides was affected by pesticide availability in the runoff interaction layer which was mainly influenced by the application date, pesticide sorption, degradation rate, and timing of rainfall event. This finding is in agreement with a study by Boithias et al (2014) who carried out a sensitivity study for SWAT using plausible ranges of application dates for two contrasting pre-emergence herbicides; the authors showed that the effect of the application date was a pesticide-specific factor influenced by their bioavailability.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Uncertainty analyses showed that pesticide application date was the most critical input parameter. These results agree with the findings of other studies (Boithias et al, 2014;Boulange et al, 2012;Holvoet et al, 2005). Holvoet et al (2005) suggested that application date had greater impact than application rate and rainfall errors to simulate atrazine emissions based on a sensitivity analysis for SWAT.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The influence of uncertainties on model results varies depending on the 285 sensitivity of the parameters; higher uncertainties on the most sensitive parameters would generate a 286 greater impact on the accuracy of the simulation. Sensitivity analysis of pesticide fate models including SPIDER and MACRO have shown that simulations are greatly influenced by the quality and adequacy of precipitation data (Dubus and Brown, 2002;, pesticide sorption and degradation parameters (Dubus and Brown, 2002) and pesticide usage details, particularly application dates (Boithias et al, 2014;Holvoet et al, 2005). For many years, the UK Meteorological Office (2010) has used the tipping-bucket rain gauge for the automatic recording of rainfall.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes driving pesticide fate and transport are on the whole well-known and are incorporated in various pesticide models operating at plot or watershed spatial scales, such as the crop model STICS (Simulateur mulTIdiscplinaire pour les Cultures Standard), MACRO (Water and solute transport in macroporous soils), PEARL (Pesticide Emission Assessment at Regional and Local scales), PRZM (Pesticide Root Zone Model), and SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) [20,21]. Several studies have already shown that the watershed-scale SWAT model was an efficient tool to model pesticides fate and transport [22][23][24][25]. However, the SWAT model performance can be restricted by its two-phase partitioning approach, which is inadequate when it comes to simulating pesticides with limited dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%