2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
123
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
123
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, research by Carter and Jennings (2002), Carter (2005, and Carter and Easton (2011) propose Purchasing Social Responsibility and Logistics Social Responsibility, which encompass social issues such as diversity, philanthropy, safety, and human rights in the supply chain. Similarly, studies by Whooley (2004) and Maloni and Brown (2006) propose the importance of safety, diversity, equity, human rights and labour practices in the supply chain, whereas other scholars describe similar means through which such social issues can be addressed in the supply chain (Clarkson, 1995;Strong, 1997;McWilliams and Siegel, 2001;Guinee et al, 2011;Macombe et al, 2013;Sala et al, 2013;Martínez-Blanco et al, 2014). Chin and Tat (2015) have identified employee diversity practices in Malaysian manufacturing companies and their relationship to sustainability.…”
Section: Social Sustainability In the Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, research by Carter and Jennings (2002), Carter (2005, and Carter and Easton (2011) propose Purchasing Social Responsibility and Logistics Social Responsibility, which encompass social issues such as diversity, philanthropy, safety, and human rights in the supply chain. Similarly, studies by Whooley (2004) and Maloni and Brown (2006) propose the importance of safety, diversity, equity, human rights and labour practices in the supply chain, whereas other scholars describe similar means through which such social issues can be addressed in the supply chain (Clarkson, 1995;Strong, 1997;McWilliams and Siegel, 2001;Guinee et al, 2011;Macombe et al, 2013;Sala et al, 2013;Martínez-Blanco et al, 2014). Chin and Tat (2015) have identified employee diversity practices in Malaysian manufacturing companies and their relationship to sustainability.…”
Section: Social Sustainability In the Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, given the difficulty of obtaining information from the customer that commissioned the garment from the study case, sector level and country-specific data were considered, adopting an approach similar to those used by Padilla-Rivera et al [37], Vuaillat et al [38] and, Martínez-Blanco et al [39]: data collection includes both primary and specific data (at company and product level) and generic data (at country-specific sector level-global and national processes). Although social impacts are mainly due to company behaviour and the main scope of the analysis is to evaluate its influence on territorial values, country and sector specific data are also taken into account when primary data are not available; generic data are taken into account for background processes through the use of the Social Hotspot Database.…”
Section: Inventory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both attributes chosen for analysis have different levels of abstraction, i.e., labor relations can be perceived as a part of a larger attribute-power relations. This corresponds to the idea presented by several authors that the impacts of social relations are multi-layered [14,16]. The selection of attributes at different scales allows us to ascertain separately each attribute's performance; to observe how social performance is conditioned by the attributes' inter-relations; to grasp the multi-layered nature of the social dimension; and to trace the links between the attributes.…”
Section: The Social Dimension Of Food Chainsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The level of the methodological sophistication of the measurement instruments associated with each of the sustainability pillars differs significantly. The social dimension lags behind in terms of both its methodological approaches and the empirical evidence it has generated [11,14,15].…”
Section: The Social Dimension Of Food Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%