2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017ms001234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application and Evaluation of an Explicit Prognostic Cloud‐Cover Scheme in GRAPES Global Forecast System

Abstract: An explicit prognostic cloud‐cover scheme (PROGCS) is implemented into the Global/Regional Assimilation and Prediction System (GRAPES) for global middle‐range numerical weather predication system (GRAPES_GFS) to improve the model performance in simulating cloud cover and radiation. Unlike the previous diagnostic cloud‐cover scheme (DIAGCS), PROGCS considers the formation and dissipation of cloud cover by physically connecting it to the cumulus convection and large‐scale stratiform condensation processes. Our s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding the cloud properties and processes is still not sufficient so that representation of clouds remains as one of the largest uncertainties for future climate prediction in all climate models (Solomon et al, 2007;Jiang et al, 2012;Boucher et al, 2013;Ma et al, 2018). Slingo (1990) suggested that the top-of-the-atmosphere (TOA) radiative forcing by doubled CO 2 can be balanced by a 15-20% increase in the amount of low clouds, 20-35% increase in liquid water path, or 15-20% decrease in cloud mean droplet radius.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the cloud properties and processes is still not sufficient so that representation of clouds remains as one of the largest uncertainties for future climate prediction in all climate models (Solomon et al, 2007;Jiang et al, 2012;Boucher et al, 2013;Ma et al, 2018). Slingo (1990) suggested that the top-of-the-atmosphere (TOA) radiative forcing by doubled CO 2 can be balanced by a 15-20% increase in the amount of low clouds, 20-35% increase in liquid water path, or 15-20% decrease in cloud mean droplet radius.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clouds are among the most common and important meteorological phenomena, covering over 66 % of the global surface (Rossow and Schiffer, 1991;Carslaw, 2009;Stephens, 2005;Zhao et al, 2019;Wang and Zhao, 2017). The analysis of cloud condition and cloud cover plays a key role in various applications (Papin et al, 2002;Yang et al, 2014;Yuan et al, 2015;Li et al, 2018;Ma et al, 2018;Bao et al, 2019). Localized and simultaneous cloud conditions can be accurately acquired with a high temporal and spatial resolution of ground-based observed clouds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the formation of low-level clouds is governed by small-scale turbulent processes, the associated controlling factors of low-cloud fraction (LCF) are complex. Although Ma et al has found a prognostic method of cloud-cover calculation (PROGCS) which has significant advantage over the conventional diagnostic one, the complex controlling factors still are the main sources of the uncertainty in state-of-the-art models [6]. For example, Fan et al found that the aerosol errors have a certain contribution to cloud fraction biases in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) simulations [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%