2019
DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2019.1588424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application and design of esterase-responsive nanoparticles for cancer therapy

Abstract: Nanoparticles have been developed for tumor treatment due to the enhanced permeability and retention effects. However, lack of specific cancer cells selectivity results in low delivery efficiency and undesired side effects. In that case, the stimuli-responsive nanoparticles system designed for the specific structure and physicochemical properties of tumors have attracted more and more attention of researchers. Esterase-responsive nanoparticle system is widely used due to the overexpressed esterase in tumor cel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(155 reference statements)
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PEG modification on the surface of nanoparticles could shield the surface from aggregation, opsonization, and phagocytosis, prolonging systemic circulation time. 34 According to the pH difference between tumor tissues and normal tissues, 35 pH-response FA-PEG-HZ-GO ligand was designed for the nanoparticle preparation. FA-CBP/PTX-LPNs were prepared by a one-step nanoprecipitation method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEG modification on the surface of nanoparticles could shield the surface from aggregation, opsonization, and phagocytosis, prolonging systemic circulation time. 34 According to the pH difference between tumor tissues and normal tissues, 35 pH-response FA-PEG-HZ-GO ligand was designed for the nanoparticle preparation. FA-CBP/PTX-LPNs were prepared by a one-step nanoprecipitation method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to introduce acidic-sensitive moiety in the micellar assembly to promote the SRD. Finally, an enzymatic driven degradation, for example, by an esterase, can be induced within the target tissue [115]. PLA is typically conjugated with an amphiphilic block copolymers (ABPs) to introduce hydrophilic residues in the hydrophobic structure of the biopolyesters.…”
Section: Stimuli-responsive Biopolymer-based Ddsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of chemical anticancer drugs have been well developed and clinically used in these decades, such as doxorubicin (DOX) (Zhang et al, 2012;Fabbri et al, 2016), paclitaxel (PTX) (Markman & Mekhail, 2002;Yang et al, 2018), and camptothecin (CPT) (Venditto & Simanek, 2010;Llin as et al, 2018); however, these drugs are limited in the further clinical applications due to the serious side-effects caused by offtargeting and low therapeutic efficacy (Jungk et al, 2016;Yoshizawa et al, 2016). To overcome these obstacles, nanoscale drug delivery systems (DDSs) have attracted more and more attention and been extensively investigated (Chen et al, 2014), such as polymeric micelles (PMs), nanoparticles (NPs), prodrug, and liposome (Zhang et al, 2016;Zylberberg & Matosevic, 2016;Huang et al, 2018;Li et al, 2018;Dong et al, 2019). These effective DDSs are used to deliver hydrophobic or hydrophilic therapeutics which exhibit poor pharmacokinetics and high cytotoxicity to the site of tumor (Wang et al, 2016;Qin et al, 2017;Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%