2022
DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2022.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application and comparison of several machine learning methods in the prognosis of cervical cancer

Abstract: Accurate prognosis of cervical cancer in the clinical setting is challenging because of the complexity of the causative factors. Considering the drawbacks of the widely used Cox proportional hazards model, such as the inability to fully use the information and the possible failure to achieve the best fit, several new attempts based on machine learning have been developed to find better prognostic prediction models. However, the application of these attempts is often limited, because they often rely on public d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, reliance on public databases has limited the use of these efforts. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the value of ML in enhancing performance in predicting the prognosis of cervical cancer ( 19 ). Depending on the learning method, there are three broad categories of ML: supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning.…”
Section: Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reliance on public databases has limited the use of these efforts. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the value of ML in enhancing performance in predicting the prognosis of cervical cancer ( 19 ). Depending on the learning method, there are three broad categories of ML: supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning.…”
Section: Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%