2011
DOI: 10.3901/jme.2011.15.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicable Equation Study of Lubrication Calculation of Surface Texture Based on CFD Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total actual contact area and normal load of two rough surfaces can be represented as [24][25][26][27]…”
Section: A Normal Load and Contact Area Of Solid Contact Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total actual contact area and normal load of two rough surfaces can be represented as [24][25][26][27]…”
Section: A Normal Load and Contact Area Of Solid Contact Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some prefer the Reynolds equation due to its good conformity between theoretical analysis and experimental tests [30][31][32], whereas others recommend the more accurate N-S equation [33][34][35] due to consideration of the fluid inertial term. By referring to the study of the application scope of the Reynolds equation in surface texture theoretical modeling [36], it has been shown that the influence of the inertia term can be ignored when the clearance ratio L/h ≥ 46 (h is the film thickness, and L is the typical length of friction pair), in which case the Reynolds equation can replace the N-S equation for The friction simulation results in Figure 2b show that the maximum stress values of the triangle texture are the largest (the values of the upper and bottom sliders are 21.29 MPa and 30.9 MPa, respectively), whereas the values of the diamond, ellipse, and hexagon textures are relatively smaller. The results of the upper and bottom sliders are given 60% and 40% weights, respectively, for comprehensive evaluation.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some prefer the Reynolds equation due to its good conformity between theoretical analysis and experimental tests [30][31][32], whereas others recommend the more accurate N-S equation [33][34][35] due to consideration of the fluid inertial term. By referring to the study of the application scope of the Reynolds equation in surface texture theoretical modeling [36], it has been shown that the influence of the inertia term can be ignored when the clearance ratio L/h ≥ 46 (h is the film thickness, and L is the typical length of friction pair), in which case the Reynolds equation can replace the N-S equation for numerical analysis, but with consideration of the effect of the cavitation phenomenon on pressure distribution.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the k-e RNG model is more accurate to predict flow fields involving large flow separation. Ma et al 32 find that the turbulence occurs around the asperities, which leads to the declination of load-bearing capacity; this means that the physical parameters of lubricant change quickly and significantly with time and position. Therefore, the RNG k-e turbulent model, proposed by Launder and Spalding, 33 is adopted in the simulation because it is applicable for calculation of turbulent flow especially when the streamlines are bent largely due to the surface texture.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%