Physiotherapists 2019
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of the Arabic version of the quality of life (QOL) questionnaire (VQ11) in Tunisian patients with COPD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 27 The VQ11 is mainly validated in COPD patients and is not proposed for being used in the general population. 50 However, the VQ11 is usually used in our departments, 51 easily administered, and seems reliable with the indication of a PRP in our study as it precisely assesses the alteration of HRQoL related to respiratory disability. 27 The third limitation involves the use of a non-validated Arabic version of the Voorrips questionnaire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 27 The VQ11 is mainly validated in COPD patients and is not proposed for being used in the general population. 50 However, the VQ11 is usually used in our departments, 51 easily administered, and seems reliable with the indication of a PRP in our study as it precisely assesses the alteration of HRQoL related to respiratory disability. 27 The third limitation involves the use of a non-validated Arabic version of the Voorrips questionnaire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“… 50 The VQ11 Arabic version was used. 51 The third part of the interview aimed to determine the current presence of and tendency towards anxiety or depression at the time of evaluation via the hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) questionnaire. 52 The latter includes 14 questions (score range 0–3); scored to separately estimate the anxiety and depressive status (seven questions each).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it was more appropriate to discuss the aforementioned point ( ie ; use of a non-validated version of VQ11) as an additional study limitation as previously done in a Tunisian study ( Rejeb et al, 2018 ). On the other hand, since the Arabic version of VQ11 is applicable in Tunisian COPD patients with reliable results ( Knaz et al, 2020 ), the author is wondering why it was not applied ( Knaz et al, 2020 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%