2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of strain energy density criterion for fracture prediction of notched PLA specimens produced via fused deposition modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter cases may be mainly caused by the loss of accuracy of the Creager–Paris expression to determine the stress distribution (Creager–Paris solutions require slender notches in which the notch length is significantly larger than the notch radius). Figure 7 , Figure 8 and Figure 9 compare the predicted results (P ASED , P ASED-EMC or P ASED-FMC ) with the experimental loads (P EXP ) along with the ±20% lines, which represents a commonly accepted deviation in fracture research [ 25 , 28 , 30 ]. In general, it seems that the ASED-EMC model provides more accurate conservative predictions than the ASED-FMC approach, although this model seems to be more accurate for the lower notch radii (0.25 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter cases may be mainly caused by the loss of accuracy of the Creager–Paris expression to determine the stress distribution (Creager–Paris solutions require slender notches in which the notch length is significantly larger than the notch radius). Figure 7 , Figure 8 and Figure 9 compare the predicted results (P ASED , P ASED-EMC or P ASED-FMC ) with the experimental loads (P EXP ) along with the ±20% lines, which represents a commonly accepted deviation in fracture research [ 25 , 28 , 30 ]. In general, it seems that the ASED-EMC model provides more accurate conservative predictions than the ASED-FMC approach, although this model seems to be more accurate for the lower notch radii (0.25 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASED criterion has been validated in numerous materials with brittle or quasi-brittle behaviour and different loading conditions (e.g., [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]). In a recent publication, Seibert et al [ 30 ] successfully applied the ASED criterion in additive manufactured polylactic acid (PLA) material by using an alternative approach to determine the control volume used in this criterion (see Section 2 ). Alternatively, in the presence of non-linear behaviour, Torabi proposed the Equivalent Material Concept (EMC) [ 31 ], with the idea of transforming a non-linear material (in terms of tensile behaviour) into an equivalent linear-elastic material and allowing the use of the corresponding (generally simpler) elastic assessment tools (e.g., TDC [ 32 ], ASED [ 32 , 33 ], Maximum Tangential Stress [ 34 ], etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the unique features of 3D printed materials, over the last decade, the Sheffield Structural Integrity Research Group has run a number of experimental/ theoretical projects to assess whether the TCD is successful in assessing the static [38][39][40][41][42][43] and fatigue [44][45][46] strength of notched/flawed 3D printed materials. In what follows, some specific outcomes from this body of systematic research work will be reviewed and revisited by focusing attention specifically on polymers and concrete.…”
Section: Additively Manufactured Polymers and Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In simulation, using PFC 2D software, the results indicated that increasing water content within the rock significantly decreased the coal strength, strain ratio (strain to peak strain), Young's modulus, AE energy (average), and the maximum energy of a single AE event. Some researchers used strain energy density for fracture predictions [44][45][46][47]. Lin et al studied the AE parameters during disccutter-induced rock fragmentation processes under various water conditions [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%