2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-017-1422-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of selected methods and sorbents to simultaneous removal of siloxanes and other impurities from biogas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to mention that long time is required for RP and EP to achieve equilibrium (170 h), which can be due to the low specific surface area (< 2 m 2 /g). Nevertheless, these low-cost materials can reduce the siloxane D4 concentration to values lower than the recommended by leading manufacturers ( < 28 mg/m 3 ) (Gaj, 2017).…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to mention that long time is required for RP and EP to achieve equilibrium (170 h), which can be due to the low specific surface area (< 2 m 2 /g). Nevertheless, these low-cost materials can reduce the siloxane D4 concentration to values lower than the recommended by leading manufacturers ( < 28 mg/m 3 ) (Gaj, 2017).…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In WWTP and landfills, typical concentrations of siloxanes in biogas are between 1-400 mg/Nm 3 (Dewil et al, 2006), where octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) is the common siloxane compound found (Tran et al, 2019a). Although, there is no legislation to regulate the amount of siloxanes to avoid damages in the combustion systems, some recommendations had been made for limiting the concentration of siloxanes in biogas from 0.3 to 28.0 mg/m 3 (Gaj, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern technologies for siloxane removal from biogas are mainly based on physical adsorption using such sorbents as activated carbon, silica gels, zeolites and molecular sieves [19,20]. Above 99 % of siloxane removal efficiency in accessible technologies can be achieved, reducing their concentrations to below 0.1 mg•m -3 [3,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of simultaneous intermittent oxygen injection and caustic shock-loading was studied by Lin et al An adsorption method using a natural zeolite mineral (halloysite) was proposed by Gaj (2017) A novel polyacrylic acid based polymer adsorbent exposed to adsorption/regeneration cycles was evaluated as a biogas siloxane adsorbent (Jung et al, 2017). At room temperature (25 °C), the decamethylcyclopentasiloxane adsorption capacity was reported to be 21.55 mg/g adsorbent and the thermal desorption from the exhausted polymer was greater than 95% at 80°C.…”
Section: Physiochemical Odor/emissions Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%