2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-iii-3-441-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of New Approaches of Sensor Orientation to Micro Aerial Vehicles

Abstract: ABSTRACT:This study highlights the benefits of precise aerial position and attitude control in the context of mapping with Micro Aerial Vehicles (MAVs). Accurate mapping with MAVs is gaining importance in applications such as corridor mapping, road and pipeline inspections or mapping of large areas with homogeneous surface structure, e.g. forests or agricultural fields. There, accurate aerial control plays a major role in successful terrain reconstruction and artifact-free ortophoto generation. The presented e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The option of using RGB camera external parameters computed by the SfM photogrammetric processing has been considered to estimate UAV trajectory [30]. The hyperspectral acquisition is performed at 50 Hz and taking 10 photos per second would enable camera position and attitude to be computed at 10 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The option of using RGB camera external parameters computed by the SfM photogrammetric processing has been considered to estimate UAV trajectory [30]. The hyperspectral acquisition is performed at 50 Hz and taking 10 photos per second would enable camera position and attitude to be computed at 10 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this, feature points are extracted and matched within massive amounts of images, additional sensing outputs are added if available, and a global optimization (bundle adjustment) is operated [7]. Geolocalized data can be included through the use of GNSS sensors [8], making the accuracy sensitive to GNSS flaws, and by manually installing geo-localized anchor points in the scene [9], which is a tedious and expensive operation. This process must be performed offline, and is unscalable for producing large maps of accurate landmarks.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GCPs' positions (x, y, z coordinates) were measured using the Trimble GNSS receiver connected with the Croatian Positioning System (CROPOS) which enables to obtain both horizontal and vertical positional accuracy from 2 to 5 cm (CROPOS -Users' Manual). Due to dense forest and mostly invisible ground from the air, it was not possible to provide (set up) the regular spatial distribution of GCPs over the entire study area which enables the most accurate orientation of images [26]. Therefore, GCPs were set up and measured on the forest roads from where they can be easily detected on UAV images (Figure 1).…”
Section: Lidar-based Canopy Digital Surface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%