2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of Monte Carlo cross validation technique for model development and validation using generalised least squares regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of different interpolation methods (OK, OCK, KED, IDW, and RBF) used in this study are evaluated and compared through cross-validation process. The cross-validation is a simple leave-one-out FIGURE 5 Experimental variograms and fitted variogram models based on the collocated elevation data for (a) Middle Yarra River catchment, and (b) Ovens River catchment validation procedure (Haddad, Rahman, Zaman, & Shrestha, 2013) in which observations are removed one at a time from the dataset and then re-estimated from the remaining observations using the adopted model. Cross-validation provides important evidence of the performance measures for the interpolation methods.…”
Section: Assessment Of Interpolation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of different interpolation methods (OK, OCK, KED, IDW, and RBF) used in this study are evaluated and compared through cross-validation process. The cross-validation is a simple leave-one-out FIGURE 5 Experimental variograms and fitted variogram models based on the collocated elevation data for (a) Middle Yarra River catchment, and (b) Ovens River catchment validation procedure (Haddad, Rahman, Zaman, & Shrestha, 2013) in which observations are removed one at a time from the dataset and then re-estimated from the remaining observations using the adopted model. Cross-validation provides important evidence of the performance measures for the interpolation methods.…”
Section: Assessment Of Interpolation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are mainly Monte Carlo (Haddad et al, 2013), leave-one-out (Jaafar et al, 2011) or k-fold cross-validation. In this case, the k-fold cross-validation method was used, which is based on splitting the data set into k similarly large subsamples and running the calibration and validation k times when using always one subsample for validation while using the others together for calibration.…”
Section: Methodology Parameterisation and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the explanatory power of the variables was tested. The choice to include a variable in the model was conditioned by the improvement of the coefficient of determination and Nash criterion in cross-validation (Wan Jaafar et al, 2011;Cipriani et al, 2012;Haddad et al, 2013;Gao and Xie, 2014). The leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) test was based on (n -1) sites in each of the n iterations, where n is the number of sites in the homogeneous region of interest.…”
Section: -Cv L-cs and L-ck (H < 1) Regions I Ii And Iii Were Foundmentioning
confidence: 99%