2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of locally reacting boundary conditions to porous material layer backed by rigid wall: Wave-based numerical study in non-diffuse sound field with unevenly distributed sound absorbing surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In non-diffuse sound fields, the incident angle dependence of surface impedance has considerable influence on the resulting sound field, as presented by Yasuda et al [12]. Using a non-diffused sound field with unevenly distributed absorbers, they showed the difference between extended and local reactions for a porous material layer with a rigid wall [12]. In addition, the example can confirm the inappropriateness of using diffuse field theory such as Sabine and Eyring formulas.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Presented Fe Solver With Surface Impedancementioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In non-diffuse sound fields, the incident angle dependence of surface impedance has considerable influence on the resulting sound field, as presented by Yasuda et al [12]. Using a non-diffused sound field with unevenly distributed absorbers, they showed the difference between extended and local reactions for a porous material layer with a rigid wall [12]. In addition, the example can confirm the inappropriateness of using diffuse field theory such as Sabine and Eyring formulas.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Presented Fe Solver With Surface Impedancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…This sound field is an appropriate example because the resulting sound field becomes a non-diffuse sound field, as explained later. In non-diffuse sound fields, the incident angle dependence of surface impedance has considerable influence on the resulting sound field, as presented by Yasuda et al [12]. Using a non-diffused sound field with unevenly distributed absorbers, they showed the difference between extended and local reactions for a porous material layer with a rigid wall [12].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Presented Fe Solver With Surface Impedancementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although they entail a huge computational effort for acoustic simulations especially at kilohertz frequencies in a real-sized room, their application to room acoustics prediction is increasing gradually by virtue of the progress of computer technology and the continuous development of efficient methods [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In addition, some recent studies [16,18,22,25] use extended-reaction boundary conditions to address both the frequency dependent and incident-angle dependent absorption characteristics of sound absorbers accurately, whereas many studies use the simplest local-reaction boundary conditions, which simplify the incident-angle dependence of surface impedance. Nevertheless, wave-based predictions are still time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the significance of introducing extended reaction boundaries into computer models has been demonstrated -using phased beam tracing, the influence on the steady state sound pressure level in frequency bands was shown by Hodgson and Wareing [27] and on several acoustic parameters (strength, reverberation time and rapid speech transmission index) by Yousefzadeh and Hodgson [28]. Recently, Yasuda et al [29] showed by wave-based modeling that the extended reaction alters the response in particular at low frequencies, which is also the frequency range of our interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%