Proceedings of ISSSTA'95 International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications
DOI: 10.1109/isssta.1996.563775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of importance sampling for Rayleigh fading mobile radio channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the bias factors are not properly chosen, the IS estimator becomes biased, i.e., the mean of the IS estimator is no longer equal to the expected error probability. These effects can be explained by the weight spectrum in [8]. This behavior is confirmed by simulation results in Fig.…”
Section: Cis and Cis-rayleigh For Ostbc Systemsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the bias factors are not properly chosen, the IS estimator becomes biased, i.e., the mean of the IS estimator is no longer equal to the expected error probability. These effects can be explained by the weight spectrum in [8]. This behavior is confirmed by simulation results in Fig.…”
Section: Cis and Cis-rayleigh For Ostbc Systemsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In particular, we investigate the efficiency of CIS technique and numerically show by computer simulation that for OSTBC system, the advantage of CIS over MC becomes nearly unity. For a single-input single-output (SISO) system with a frequencynonselective Rayleigh fading channel, it is shown in [8] that biasing the Rayleigh process is more efficient than biasing the noise process. This new approach is called CIS-Rayleigh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cost of importance sampling is that it is not easy to construct nonuniform random variables that have densities similar to p(y I x, ) and p(y l*o) respectively [116]. This problem has been solved in many applications in signal detection that estimate small probability of false alarm [117][118][119][120][121][122]. However, they are efficient only when the PFA is very small (generally smaller than l.e-4), which is not the case in current NDE techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%